Boris Sorochkin v. Andrew Saul
Boris Sorochkin |
Andrew M. Saul |
2:2020cv05392 |
June 17, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Michael W Fitzgerald |
Alexander F MacKinnon |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon for all further proceedings. Please use the case number CV20-5392 AFM on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (sn) |
Filing 11 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), (Yim, Young) |
Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Boris Sorochkin, upon Defendant Andrew M. Saul served on 7/13/2020, answer due 9/11/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 certified mail receipt)(Yim, Young) |
Filing 9 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Andrew M. Saul. (Attorney Armand D Roth added to party Andrew M. Saul(pty:dft))(Roth, Armand) |
Filing 8 SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER REGARDING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (See order for details.) (es) |
Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER RE: PROCEDURES IN SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon: *SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS.* (es) |
Filing 6 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Andrew M. Saul. (jtil) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and referred to Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (jtil) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 Boris Sorochkin. (Yim, Young) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties (Yim, Young) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Boris Sorochkin. (Yim, Young) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-26852791 - Fee: $400. (Attorney Young Bin Yim added to party Boris Sorochkin(pty:pla))(Yim, Young) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Boris Sorochkin v. Andrew Saul | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Boris Sorochkin | |
Represented By: | Young Bin Yim |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul | |
Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-CV |
Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA |
Represented By: | Armand D Roth |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.