Luis Marquez v. Genuine Parts Company et al
| Luis Marquez |
| Does 1-10, Genuine Parts Company and Socal Auto & Truck Parts Inc. |
| 2:2020cv05464 |
| June 19, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Patricia Donahue |
| Dolly M Gee |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Socal Auto & Truck Parts Inc. answer now due 9/11/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Socal Auto & Truck Parts Inc..(Attorney Shireen Banki Rogers added to party Socal Auto & Truck Parts Inc.(pty:dft))(Rogers, Shireen) |
| Filing 19 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Luis Marquez, upon Defendant Socal Auto & Truck Parts Inc. served on 8/2/2020, answer due 8/24/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Natalie Krossland - Assistant Manager / Authorized in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 18 21-Day Summons Issued re First Amended Complaint #16 as to Defendant Socal Auto & Truck Parts Inc. (gk) |
| Filing 17 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition #16 filed by plaintiff Luis Marquez. (Seabock, Christopher) |
| Filing 16 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant Does, Socal Auto & Truck Parts Inc. amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by plaintiff Luis Marquez (Attachments: #1 proof of service)(Seabock, Christopher) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Christopher A Seabock on behalf of Plaintiff Luis Marquez (Attachments: #1 proof of service)(Attorney Christopher A Seabock added to party Luis Marquez(pty:pla))(Seabock, Christopher) |
Filing 14
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - ORDER DECLINING TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFF'S STATE LAW CLAIM by Judge Dolly M. Gee: The Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause in writing why the Court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim asserted in the Complaint #8 . Having reviewed and considered Plaintiff's response to the Court's Order to Show Cause #13 , the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claim. Plaintiff alternatively seeks certification of an interlocutory appeal or the stay of any order declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction pending resolution of an appeal filed on 8/20/2019, in Ninth Circuit Case No. 19-55974. The Court concludes that Plaintiff has not satisfied the requirements for either certification of an interlocutory appeal or a stay pending appeal. The Court denies Plaintiff's request for a stay or certification of an interlocutory appeal. The Court dismisses the state law claim without prejudice. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)
|
| Filing 13 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Luis Marquezto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,,, Order to Show Cause,,, #8 (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2, #5 Proof of Service)(Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Luis Marquez, upon Defendant Genuine Parts Company served on 6/24/2020, answer due 7/15/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Agent for Service of Process: C T CORPORATION SYSTEM (Jessica (DOE), intake specialist) in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Luis Marquez, re Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only #9 , Notice to Parties ADA Disability Access Litigation (ADR-20) #10 served on 06/26/2020. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 10 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (kti) |
|
Filing 9
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti)
|
|
Filing 8
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFF'S STATE LAW CLAIM by Judge Dolly M. Gee: The Court orders Plaintiff to show cause in writing why the Court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim. In responding to this Order to Show Cause, Plaintiff shall identify the amount of statutory damages Plaintiff seeks to recover. Plaintiff shall file a Response to this Order to Show Cause by 7/2/2020. Failure to timely or adequately respond to this Order to Show Cause may, without further warning, result in the Court declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim and the dismissal of any such claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1367(c). Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Genuine Parts Company. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Luis Marquez. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Luis Marquez, (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Luis Marquez. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-26876964 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Luis Marquez. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Luis Marquez(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
