Silvia Garcia v. Walmart Inc. et al
Silvia Garcia |
Walmart Inc. and Does 1 to 30 |
2:2020cv05473 |
June 19, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Paul L Abrams |
Ronald SW Lew |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. Scheduling Conference set for 9/22/2020 at 10:00 AM. See order for detials. (jre) |
Filing 10 TEXT ONLY ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew: The parties having timely filed their responses to this Court's Order to Show Cause #7 and thereby making a showing regarding the filing of Defendant's Answer in the State Court proceeding, the Court hereby DISCHARGES the Order to Show Cause #7 issued on 6/29/2020. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jre) |
Filing 9 DECLARATION of Todd Mannis, Esq. re Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,,,, Order to Show Cause,,,, #7 filed by Plaintiff Silvia Garcia. (Mannis, Todd) |
Filing 8 DECLARATION of Vanessa M. Hooker, Esq. re Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,,,, Order to Show Cause,,,, #7 filed by Defendant Walmart Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Hooker, Vanessa) |
Filing 7 MINUTE IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. The Court, on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff /s to show cause in writing no later than July 3, 2020, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will accept one of the following, if it is filed on or before the above date, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligently: Defendant/s Answer/Response to the Complaint/Plaintiffs Request for Entry of Default on defendant/s OR appropriate request for dismissal of this action. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff/s is due. Plaintiff is to serve notice of this Order on all named parties in this action who have been served but have not yet appeared. See order for further details. (shb) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Ronald S. W. Lew and Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. (ghap) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Walmart Inc., (Hooker, Vanessa) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF LODGING filed of State Court File re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 (Hooker, Vanessa) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Walmart Inc.. (Hooker, Vanessa) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Ventura Superior Court - Hall of Justice, case number 56-2019-00531468-CU-PO-VTA Receipt No: ACACDC-26882749 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Walmart Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Declaration of Vanessa M. Hooker, Esq.) (Attorney Vanessa Hooker added to party Walmart Inc.(pty:dft))(Hooker, Vanessa) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 to 30, Walmart Inc., filed by plaintiff Silvia Garcia. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 8/2/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 1, 005) (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.