David Kagan et al v. City of Los Angeles, et al
| Mr David Kagan, Mrs. Rachel K Revere, Mrs. Judith Kagan, Mr. Frank J Revere, David Kagan, Frank Revere, Judith Kagan and Rachel K. Revere |
| CITY OF LOS ANGELES, City of Los Angeles Housing + Community Investment Department and City of Los Angeles Housing and Community Investment Department |
| 2:2020cv05515 |
| June 22, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dolly M Gee |
| Autumn D Spaeth |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Supplement(Motion related), #20 . The following error(s) was/were found: This document tendered for the judge's approval should have been submitted as a separate PDF attachment to the Motion, document number 16, or a Notice of Lodging, Local Rule 5-4.4.1. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (gk) |
| Filing 20 SUPPLEMENT to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(B)(1) and 12(B)(6), or in the Alternative, for this Court to Abstain from Exercise of Jurisdiction; Memorandum of Points and Authorit #16 [Proposed] Order filed by Defendant City of Los Angeles. (Perry, Catherine) |
| Filing 19 Notice of Interested Parties filed by Defendant City of Los Angeles (Perry, Catherine) |
| Filing 18 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(B)(1) and 12(B)(6), or in the Alternative, for this Court to Abstain from Exercise of Jurisdiction; Memorandum of Points and Authorit #16 filed by Defendant City of Los Angeles. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Perry, Catherine) |
| Filing 17 DECLARATION of Catherine V. Perry in Support of Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(B)(1) and 12(B)(6), or in the Alternative for this Court to Abstain from the Exercise of Jurisdiction NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(B)(1) and 12(B)(6), or in the Alternative, for this Court to Abstain from Exercise of Jurisdiction; Memorandum of Points and Authorit #16 filed by Defendant City of Los Angeles. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Perry, Catherine) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(B)(1) and 12(B)(6), or in the Alternative, for this Court to Abstain from Exercise of Jurisdiction; Memorandum of Points and Authorities filed by Defendant City of Los Angeles. Motion set for hearing on 10/16/2020 at 09:30 AM before Judge Dolly M. Gee. (Perry, Catherine) |
| Filing 15 Second STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to City of Los Angeles answer now due 8/12/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant City of Los Angeles.(Perry, Catherine) |
| Filing 14 SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Plaintiff Frank Revere, upon Attorney City of Los Angeles served on 6/25/2020, answer due 8/5/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Clerks Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Revere, Frank) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE filed by Attorney Frank Revere. (Revere, Frank) |
| Filing 12 re: Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only #10 (Revere, Frank) |
| Filing 11 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to City of Los Angeles answer now due 8/5/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant City of Los Angeles.(Attorney Catherine V Perry added to party City of Los Angeles(pty:dft))(Perry, Catherine) |
Filing 10
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti)
|
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants City of Los Angeles, City of Los Angeles Housing and Community Investment Department. (car) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Plaintiff Frank Revere. correcting Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #2 (Revere, Frank) |
| Filing 7 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Attorney Frank Revere. (Revere, Frank) |
| Filing 6 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Frank Revere. (Revere, Frank) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Attorney Frank Revere, (Revere, Frank) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (car) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with filing fee previously paid ($400 paid on 06/22/2020, receipt number ACACDC-26904824), filed by plaintiff Frank J Revere. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons in a Civil Action, #3 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties)(Revere, Frank) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-26904824 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Frank J Revere. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C) (Attorney Frank Revere added to party Frank J Revere(pty:pla))(Revere, Frank) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
