STJ Enterprise, Inc. v. Denim Place, Inc. et al
| STJ Enterprise, Inc. |
| Denim Place, Inc., Does 1 through 10, Mohamad Matar and Denim Place, Inc. doing business as Moderno |
| 2:2020cv05523 |
| June 22, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Patrick J Walsh |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. § 101 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - COURT ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. According to the parties' Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) Joint Report, "Defendants anticipate filing a Motion for Summary Judgment on issue of claim preclusion based upon the settlement and dismissal of a prior infringement case between the same parties in this court involving the same copyright. (United States District Court Case No. 2.19-cv-10854-GW-AS filed December 27, 2019.)" As indicated in the Rule 26(f) Joint Report, that prior action and this action involve the same parties and one of the two copyrights at issue in that action, plaintiff's design SP 600, with a copyright registration of VA 2-146-117. (See document for details). Because this action appears to satisfy one or more of the standards for finding this action "related" to the prior actions, the parties are ordered to show cause why they should not file a Notice of Related Case as required by Local Rule 83-1.3 indicating that this action is related to Case No. CV 19-10854 GW (ASx). The parties' responses to the Order to Show Cause shall be filed no later than August 25, 2020. (mrgo)
|
| Filing 19 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 3-4 days, filed by Plaintiff STJ Enterprise, Inc... (Jablon, Andrew) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant All Defendants, (Attorney Brian Scott Mizell added to party Does(pty:dft), Attorney Brian Scott Mizell added to party Mohamad Matar(pty:dft))(Mizell, Brian) |
|
Filing 17
SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [FRCP 16, 26(f)] ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. (Scheduling Conference set for 9/21/2020 at 10:30 AM before Judge Percy Anderson.) (mrgo)
|
| Filing 16 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Answer to Complaint #15 . The following error(s) was/were found: Notice of Interested Parties Other error(s) with document(s): Certificate / Notice of Interested Parties should be efiled as a separate document. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lom) |
| Filing 15 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Denim Place, Inc. and Mohamad Matar Denim Place, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certification and Ntc of Interested Parties)(Attorney Brian Scott Mizell added to party Denim Place, Inc.(pty:dft))(Mizell, Brian) |
|
Filing 14
MINUTE Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal For Lack Of Prosecution by Judge Percy Anderson. The court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before 8/3/2020, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Failure to respond to this Order may result in the imposition of sanctions, including but not limited to dismissal of the complaint. (et)
|
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff STJ Enterprise, Inc., upon Defendant Mohamad Matar served on 7/1/2020, answer due 7/22/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Mohamad Matar President and Registered Agent of Denim Place, Inc. in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Jablon, Andrew) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff STJ Enterprise, Inc., upon Defendant Denim Place, Inc. served on 7/1/2020, answer due 7/22/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Denim Place, Inc. dba Moderno in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Jablon, Andrew) |
|
Filing 11
STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (See document for details) (mrgo)
|
| Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to defendants Denim Place, Inc., Mohamad Matar. (mrgo) |
| Filing 9 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff STJ Enterprise, Inc.. (Jablon, Andrew) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #2 . The following error(s) was found: Please put Central District of California. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by STJ Enterprise, Inc.. (Jablon, Andrew) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff STJ Enterprise, Inc., identifying STJ Enterprise, Inc., Plaintiff; Denim Place, Inc. dba Moderno, Defendant; and Mohamad Matar, Defendant. (Jablon, Andrew) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff STJ Enterprise, Inc.. (Jablon, Andrew) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff STJ Enterprise, Inc.. (Jablon, Andrew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-26906454 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff STJ Enterprise, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3) (Attorney Andrew V Jablon added to party STJ Enterprise, Inc.(pty:pla))(Jablon, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
