Luc Richard Elie et al v. Los Angeles Unified School District et al
| Luc Richard Elie |
| CARRIE SCHWARTZ, Los Angeles Unified School District, Ricardo Rosales, KIMBERLY ABDUL MALIK, Ken Harris, SAMUEL MARK SCHWARZMER, Jose Fernandez and NISEAN MAE ELLIOTT |
| Estate of Xavier Patterson |
| 2:2020cv05538 |
| June 22, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Autumn D Spaeth |
| Stephen V Wilson |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Los Angeles Unified School District answer now due 10/2/2020, filed by Defendant Los Angeles Unified School District.(Attorney John Robert Meehan added to party Los Angeles Unified School District(pty:dft))(Meehan, John) |
Filing 16
NEW CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
|
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Luc Richard Elie, identifying Los Angeles Unified School District; Samuel Mark Schwarzmer, Ricardo Rosales, Jose Fernandez, Carrie Schwartz, Ken Harris, Kimberly Abdul Malik and Nisean Mae Elliott. (Goldstein, Jamie) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (esa) |
| Filing 13 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Samuel Mark Schwarzmer. (esa) |
| Filing 12 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Carrie Schwartz. (esa) |
| Filing 11 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Ricardo Rosales. (esa) |
| Filing 10 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Kimberly Abdul Malik. (esa) |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Los Angeles Unified School District. (esa) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Ken Harris. (esa) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Jose Fernandez. (esa) |
| Filing 6 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Nisean Mae Elliott. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (esa) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 filed by plaintiff Luc Richard Elie, Estate of Xavier Patterson. (Attachments: #1 Summons to Samuel M. Schwarzmer, #2 Summons to Rocardo Rosales, #3 Summons to Jose Fernandez, #4 Summons to Carrie Schwartz, #5 Summons to Ken Harris, #6 Summons to Kimberly Abdul Malik, #7 Summons to Nisean Mae Elliott)(Sanguinetti, Elise) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Luc Richard Elie, Estate of Estate of Xavier Patterson. (Sanguinetti, Elise) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-26909626 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiffs Estate of Xavier Patterson, Luc Richard Elie. (Attorney Elise R Sanguinetti added to party Luc Richard Elie(pty:pla), Attorney Elise R Sanguinetti added to party Estate of Xavier Patterson(pty:est))(Sanguinetti, Elise) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
