Lickerish Limited v. Maven Coalition, Inc. et al
Lickerish Limited |
Does 1 through 10 and Maven Coalition, Inc. |
2:2020cv05621 |
June 24, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Charles F Eick |
Fernando M Olguin |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Alexander R. Malbin to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Maven Coalition, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-27679428) filed by defendant Maven Coalition, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed order granting pro hac vice application) (Olsen, John) |
Filing 16 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Scheduling Conference set for 11/5/2020 at 10:00 AM before Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (vdr) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Maven Coalition, Inc., identifying Maven, Inc.. (Olsen, John) |
Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Maven Coalition, Inc..(Olsen, John) |
Filing 13 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Maven Coalition, Inc. answer now due 8/17/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Lickerish Limited.(Doniger, Stephen) |
Filing 12 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Plaintiff Lickerish Limited. correcting Notice of Lodging #2 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit B to Complaint)(Doniger, Stephen) |
Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Lickerish Limited, upon Defendant Maven Coalition, Inc. served on 6/26/2020, answer due 7/17/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CSC - Lawyers Incorporating Service c/o Kaitlyn Mannix\Authorized Agent for Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Doniger, Stephen) |
Filing 10 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Chambers of Judge Fernando M. Olguin. This matter has been assigned to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Court refers counsel to the Court's Initial Standing Order found on the Court's Website under Judge Olguin's Procedures and Schedules. Please read this Order carefully.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (vdr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Maven Coalition, Inc. (ghap) |
Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (ghap) |
Filing 6 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Lickerish Limited. (Doniger, Stephen) |
Filing 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Lickerish Limited. (Doniger, Stephen) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Lickerish Limited, identifying Maven Coalition, Inc.. (Doniger, Stephen) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Lickerish Limited. (Doniger, Stephen) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF LODGING filed of Exhibit A and Exhibit B re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Doniger, Stephen) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-26942786 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Lickerish Limited. (Attorney Stephen M Doniger added to party Lickerish Limited(pty:pla))(Doniger, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.