Mediterranean Mezze, LLC v. Michael Nakhleh et al
| Mediterranean Mezze, LLC |
| Daphne's Inc., Michael Nakhleh, Mediterranean Cuisine Franchising Company, LLC, Noon Enterprises LTD, Daphnes Inc. and Does 1 through 20, inclusive |
| 2:2020cv05653 |
| June 25, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Rozella A Oliver |
| Otis D Wright |
| Contract: Franchise |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. THE COURT ORDERS that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lom)
|
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Mediterranean Mezze, LLC, upon Defendant Daphnes Inc. served on 7/10/2020, answer due 7/31/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon McKayla Sides, Registered Agents, Inc., Agents for Service in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Kashefipour, Idin) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), #12 . The following error(s) was/were found: Case number is incorrect or missing. Filer selected incorrect Statute Prompt as " FRCP(5)(b)(2) (D)"... Service of Process of Summons and Complaint was not made on the Clerk of USDC, but a private agent Other error(s) with document(s): Please note official case number is to include assigned Judge and Magistrate initials as: 2:20cv05653 ODW (RAOx) see docket no. 5 In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) |
| Filing 12 SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Plaintiff Mediterranean Mezze, LLC, upon Defendant Noon Enterprises LTD served on 7/13/2020, answer due 8/3/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Clerks Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Kashefipour, Idin) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), #9 , Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), #10 . The following error(s) was/were found: Filer selected incorrect Statute Prompt as " FRCP(5)(b)(2) (D)"... Service of Process of Summons and Complaint was not made on the Clerk of USDC, but a private agent Other error(s) with document(s): Please note official case number is to include assigned Judge and Magistrate initials as: 2:20cv05653 ODW (RAOx) see docket no. 5 In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) |
| Filing 10 SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Plaintiff Mediterranean Mezze, LLC, upon Defendant Mediterranean Cuisine Franchising Company, LLC served on 7/14/2020, answer due 8/4/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Clerks Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Kashefipour, Idin) |
| Filing 9 SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Plaintiff Mediterranean Mezze, LLC, upon Defendant Michael Nakhleh served on 7/14/2020, answer due 8/4/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Clerks Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Kashefipour, Idin) |
|
Filing 8
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. Counsel are STRONGLY encouraged to review the Central Districts website for additional information. The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. Please refer to the Judges procedures and schedules for detailed instructions for submission of sealed documents. (lc)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendants Daphnes Inc., Mediterranean Cuisine Franchising Company, LLC, Michael Nakhleh, Noon Enterprises LTD. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Mediterranean Mezze, LLC. (Kashefipour, Idin) |
| Filing 3 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Mediterranean Mezze, LLC, (Kashefipour, Idin) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Mediterranean Mezze, LLC. (Kashefipour, Idin) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-26953704 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Mediterranean Mezze, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D) (Attorney Idin Kashefipour added to party Mediterranean Mezze, LLC(pty:pla))(Kashefipour, Idin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
