Paul D. Beauregard et al v. Scott Arceneaux Jr. et al
| Jordan Houston p/k/a Juicy J, Paul D. Beauregard p/k/a DJ Paul, Jordan Houston and Paul D. Beauregard |
| Aristos Petrou p/k/a Ruby da Cherry, UMG Recordings, Inc., G59 Records, L.L.C., Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Scott Arceneaux Jr. p/k/a Scrim, Scott Arceneaux, Jr., Aristos Petrou and UMG Recordings, Inc. a Delaware corporation, individually and doing business as Caroline Distribution and Capitol Music Group |
| 2:2020cv05655 |
| June 25, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Ronald SW Lew |
| Alicia G Rosenberg |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 504 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiffs Paul D. Beauregard, Jordan Houston. upon G59 Records, L.L.C. waiver sent by Plaintiff on 6/29/2020, answer due 8/28/2020. Waiver of Service signed by Timothy C. Matson. (Snow, John) |
| Filing 12 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiffs Paul D. Beauregard, Jordan Houston. upon Aristos Petrou waiver sent by Plaintiff on 6/29/2020, answer due 8/28/2020. Waiver of Service signed by Timothy C. Matson. (Snow, John) |
| Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiffs Paul D. Beauregard, Jordan Houston. upon Scott Arceneaux, Jr waiver sent by Plaintiff on 6/29/2020, answer due 8/28/2020. Waiver of Service signed by Timothy C. Matson. (Snow, John) |
| Filing 10 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to UMG Recordings, Inc. answer now due 8/28/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Paul D. Beauregard; Jordan Houston.(Snow, John) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Paul D. Beauregard, Jordan Houston, upon Defendant UMG Recordings, Inc. served on 7/8/2020, answer due 7/29/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CT Corporation System, Registered Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Snow, John) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendants Scott Arceneaux, Jr, G59 Records, L.L.C., Aristos Petrou, UMG Recordings, Inc. (car) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Ronald S. W. Lew and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (car) |
| Filing 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Paul D. Beauregard p/k/a DJ Paul, Jordan Houston p/k/a Juicy J. (Snow, John) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs All Plaintiffs, (Snow, John) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Paul D. Beauregard p/k/a DJ Paul, Jordan Houston p/k/a Juicy J. (Snow, John) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Paul D. Beauregard p/k/a DJ Paul, Jordan Houston p/k/a Juicy J. (Snow, John) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-26954270 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiffs Paul D. Beauregard p/k/a DJ Paul, Jordan Houston p/k/a Juicy J. (Attorney John G Snow added to party Paul D. Beauregard p/k/a DJ Paul(pty:pla), Attorney John G Snow added to party Jordan Houston p/k/a Juicy J(pty:pla))(Snow, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
