Roger Douglas v. R.C. Johnson
| Roger Douglas |
| R.C. Johnson |
| 2:2020cv05666 |
| June 25, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Douglas F McCormick |
| James V Selna |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Motion to Stay and Abey While Petitioner Returns to State Court to Exhaust his Unexhausted claims filed by petitioner Roger Douglas. (es) |
| Filing 5 FINANCIAL ENTRY: Received $5.00 from Roger Douglas. Re: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) #1 . Receipt number LA208475. (fr) |
Filing 4
MINUTES ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE EXHAUSTION by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick: IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that within twenty-eight (28) days of the date of this Order, Petitioner do one of the following: (1) show cause in writing why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust state remedies; (2) request voluntarily dismissal of his unexhausted claims (Grounds One and Two) and elect to proceed on his exhausted claims; (3) file a formal stay-and-abey motion if he believes he can make the required showings under Rhines; or (4) request that the Petition be dismissed without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), with the understanding that any later petition may be time barred under 28 U.S.C. 2244(d)(1). (See document for details.) Petitioner is expressly warned that his failure to timely comply with this Order may result in the Petition being dismissed for the reasons stated above and for failure to prosecute. (es)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge James V. Selna and referred to Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (Attachments: #1 CV-111 Notice Re: Discrepancies in Filing of Habeas Corpus Petition) (car) |
| Filing 2 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT to Proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge Declined, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636c filed by Petitioner Roger Douglas. The Petitioner does not consent. (car) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254) Case assigned to Judge James V. Selna and referred to Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick.(Filing fee $ 5. FEE DUE), filed by Petitioner Roger Douglas. (car) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Roger Douglas v. R.C. Johnson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Roger Douglas | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: R.C. Johnson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
