Terry Fabricant v. Affinity Consultants Ltd. et al
| Terry Fabricant |
| Affinity Consultants Ltd., Does 1 through 10, inclusive and Affinity Consultants Ltd. doing business as Affinity Member Services |
| 2:2020cv05671 |
| June 25, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Charles F Eick |
| Dolly M Gee |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 0227 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Affinity Consultants Ltd. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (et) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Terry Fabricant, (Friedman, Todd) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Terry Fabricant. (Friedman, Todd) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Terry Fabricant. (Friedman, Todd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-26958093 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Terry Fabricant. (Attorney Todd M Friedman added to party Terry Fabricant(pty:pla))(Friedman, Todd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
