John Young Beattie Jr v. BMW of North America, LLC
John Young Beattie, Jr. |
BMW of North America, LLC and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
2:2020cv05752 |
June 26, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Dale S Fischer |
Jean P Rosenbluth |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 2 by Judge Dale S. Fischer. Case ordered to Court Mediation Panel for mediation. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 2/8/2021. (vv) |
Filing 17 Order re Jury Trial by Judge Dale S. Fischer. Final Pretrial Conference set for 4/5/2021 at 3:00 PM. Jury Trial set for 5/4/2021 at 8:30 AM. (REFER TO DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS) (vv) |
Filing 16 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: (IN CHAMBERS) SCHEDULING ORDER. The Court takes the Scheduling Conference off calendar and establishes the case management dates as proposed by parties in the Joint Rule 26(f) Report as further described in the Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates except as noted in the Order re Trial. (See Order re Trial for specific dates and times.) These dates and requirements are firm. The Court is very unlikely to grant continuances unless the parties establish good cause through a concrete showing. Failure to complete discovery in a timely manner does not constitute good cause, nor does the fact that a settlement conference is pending. Each side is limited to five motions in limine unless the Court orders otherwise. All fictitiously named defendants are dismissed. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (vv) |
Filing 15 REQUEST for ADR Procedure No. 2 filed. Parties request to appear before a neutral selected from the court's Mediation Panel for mediation. Filed by Plaintiff John Young Beattie, Jr(Cagliata, Jonathan) |
Filing 14 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5 days, filed by Plaintiff John Young Beattie, Jr.. (Cagliata, Jonathan) |
Filing 13 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Jonathan Carlo Cagliata counsel for Plaintiff John Young Beattie, Jr. Adding Jonathan C. Cagliata as counsel of record for John Young Beattie, Jr. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff John Young Beattie, Jr.. (Cagliata, Jonathan) |
Filing 12 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Sepehr Daghighian counsel for Plaintiff John Young Beattie, Jr. Adding Sepehr Daghighian as counsel of record for John Young Beattie, Jr. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff John Young Beattie, Jr.. (Daghighian, Sepehr) |
Filing 11 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff John Young Beattie, Jr, (Rosenstein, Michael) |
Filing 10 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Michael H Rosenstein counsel for Plaintiff John Young Beattie, Jr. Adding Michael H. Rosenstein as counsel of record for John Young Beattie, Jr. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff John Young Beattie, Jr.. (Rosenstein, Michael) |
Filing 9 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The Joint Report must include the completed Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates. Lead trial counsel are ordered to appear in person unless counsel have been excused by the Court. Scheduling Conference set for 8/3/2020 at 11:00 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (rfi) |
Filing 8 STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (esa) |
CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by defendant BMW of North America, LLC. (filed in state court 6/25/20, submitted as document 1, attachment 2)(esa) Modified on 6/29/2020 (esa). |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants BMW of North America, LLC, Does, filed by plaintiff John Young Beattie, Jr. (filed in state court 5/26/20, submitted as document 1, attachment 1) (esa) |
Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant BMW of North America, LLC, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Jury Demand #4 served on June 26, 2020. (Lehrman, Kate) |
Filing 4 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Defendant BMW of North America, LLC.. (Lehrman, Kate) |
Filing 3 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant BMW of North America, LLC, identifying BMW (US) Holding Corp.. (Lehrman, Kate) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant BMW of North America, LLC. (Lehrman, Kate) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 20STCV19808 Receipt No: ACACDC-26981112 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant BMW of North America, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C) (Attorney Kate S Lehrman added to party BMW of North America, LLC(pty:dft))(Lehrman, Kate) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.