Dennis Murphy et al v. Toyota Motor Sales USA Inc. et al
Dennis Murphy and Deborah Murphy |
TOYOTA MOTOR NORTH AMERICA, INC., a California corporation, TOYOTA MOTOR SALES U.S.A. INC, TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION, a Japanese corporation, Toyota Motor Corporation, Toyota Motor Sales USA, Inc. and Toyota Motor North America, Inc. |
2:2020cv05892 |
June 30, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Virginia A Phillips |
Autumn D Spaeth |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Deborah Murphy, Dennis Murphy. (Attachments: #1 Toyota Motor North America, #2 Toyota Motor Sales)(Padgett, Cody) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Deborah Murphy, Dennis Murphy, (Padgett, Cody) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Deborah Murphy, Dennis Murphy. (Padgett, Cody) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-27020337 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiffs Dennis Murphy, Deborah Murphy. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5) (Attorney Cody R Padgett added to party Deborah Murphy(pty:pla), Attorney Cody R Padgett added to party Dennis Murphy(pty:pla))(Padgett, Cody) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.