Healthcare Ally Management of California, LLC v. United HealthCare Services, Inc., et al
| Healthcare Ally Management of California, LLC |
| Does 1-10, Verizon Services Corp. and United HealthCare Services, Inc. |
| 2:2020cv06034 |
| July 7, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael W Fitzgerald |
| Michael R Wilner |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
ORDER ON REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF SUBSTITUTION OR WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY #16 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. The request of Verizon Services Corporation to substitution Amir Shlesinger as attorney of record instead of Daniel Heidtke is GRANTED. (iv)
|
| Filing 16 REQUEST TO SUBSTITUTE ATTORNEY Amir Shlesinger in place of attorney Daniel B. Heidtke filed by Defendant Verizon Services Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Attorney Amir Shlesinger added to party Verizon Services Corp.(pty:dft)) (Shlesinger, Amir) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER RE JURY TRIAL - I. ORDER RE DEADLINES; II. ORDER RE TRIAL PREPARATION; III. ORDER GOVERNING CONDUCT OF ATTORNEYS AND PARTIES by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. See order for deadlines and other information. (lom)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 9/13/2021. (iv)
|
| Filing 13 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. Pursuant to the Central District of California's Continuity of Operations Plan (COOP), the Court VACATES the Scheduling Conference set for 8/10/2020 at 11:00am. No appearances shall be made. The Court will review the parties' Joint Rule 26(f) Report and issue pretrial and trial dates by separate order. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (smom) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 12 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 4 days, filed by Plaintiff Healthcare Ally Management of California, LLC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Stieglitz, Jonathan) |
| Filing 11 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 7.1 filed by Defendant Verizon Services Corp. identifying Verizon Communications Inc. as Corporate Parent. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Heidtke, Daniel) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to Amended Complaint, filed by Defendant Verizon Services Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Heidtke, Daniel) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This case has been assigned to Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. This matter is set for a scheduling conference 08/10/20 at 11:00 AM (pg)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Consent to Removal filed by Defendants Verizon Services Corp.. (Heidtke, Daniel) |
| Filing 7 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Daniel B Heidtke counsel for Defendant Verizon Services Corp.. Adding Daniel B. Heidtke as counsel of record for Verizon Services Corp. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendants Verizon Services Corp.. (Attorney Daniel B Heidtke added to party Verizon Services Corp.(pty:dft))(Heidtke, Daniel) |
| Filing 6 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant United HealthCare Services, Inc., re Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #5 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 , Notice of Assignment to United States Judges(CV-18) - optional html form #4 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 served on 7/8/2020. (Wurscher, Nicole) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (ghap) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant United HealthCare Services, Inc.,, identifying United HealthCare Services, Inc. and UnitedHealth Group Incorporated. (Wurscher, Nicole) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant United HealthCare Services, Inc.,. (Wurscher, Nicole) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 20STCV07845 Receipt No: BCACDC-27103579 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant United HealthCare Services, Inc.,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - First Amended Summons and Complaint, #3 Exhibit C - United HealthCare Services, Inc.'s Answer to FAC, #4 Exhibit D - Declaration of J. Stieglitz) (Attorney Nicole Elizabeth Wurscher added to party United HealthCare Services, Inc.,(pty:dft))(Wurscher, Nicole) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Amended Complaint, filed by Defendant United HealthCare Services, Inc. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 7/7/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT C, Pg, 33)(ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1-10, United HealthCare Services, Inc., Verizon Services Corp. amending Complaint - (Discovery),, filed by plaintiff Healthcare Ally Management of California, LLC. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 6/10/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT B, Pg. 22)(ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1-10, United HealthCare Services, Inc., Verizon Services Corp. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Healthcare Ally Management of California, LLC. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 2/26/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A, Pg.8) (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
