Eldridge Womack v. Capital One, N.A. et al
Eldridge Womack |
Does 1-10 and Capital One, N.A. |
2:2020cv06083 |
July 8, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Michael W Fitzgerald |
Rozella A Oliver |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This case has been assigned to Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. This matter is set for a scheduling conference on 11/2/2020 at 11:00 AM. (iv) |
Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Capital One, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Ladd, Evan) |
Filing 11 ORDER GRANTING SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT #10 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. Capital One's time to file a responsive pleading to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended to no later than August 28, 2020. (iv) |
Filing 10 Second STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Response as to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Capital One, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ladd, Evan) |
Filing 9 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT BY NOT MORE THAN 30 DAYS #8 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. Capital One's time to file a responsive pleading to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended to no later than August 14, 2020. (iv) |
Filing 8 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Capital One, N.A. answer now due 8/14/2020, re Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Capital One, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint by Not More Than 30 Days (L.R. 8-3))(Ladd, Evan) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO ADVERSE PARTIES OF REMOVAL OF ACTION TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNDER 28 U.S.C. 1441(a), 28 U.S.C. 1332 (DIVERSITY) filed by Defendant Capital One, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Proof of Service)(Ladd, Evan) |
Filing 6 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Capital One, N.A., re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Notice of Assignment to United States Judges(CV-18) - optional html form #4 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #5 served on July 9, 2020. (Ladd, Evan) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (ghap) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Capital One Bank, identifying Capital One, N.A. (erroneously named as "Capital One Bank"); Capital One Financial Corporation; Eldridge Womack. (Ladd, Evan) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Capital One Bank. (Ladd, Evan) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 20LBCV00268 Receipt No: ACACDC-27122074 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Capital One Bank. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Attorney Evan Miller Ladd added to party Capital One Bank(pty:dft))(Ladd, Evan) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Capital One, N.A., Does 1-10. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Eldridge Womack. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 5/29/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.