Amber Machowski v. Scott Harris et al
Plaintiff: Amber Machowski
Defendant: Does 1-10 and Scott Harris
Case Number: 2:2020cv06103
Filed: July 9, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Gail J Standish
Referring Judge: Stephen V Wilson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER SETTING INITIAL STATUS CONFERENCE for 10/26/2020 at 3:00 PM before Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
August 18, 2020 Filing 11 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Scott Harris, identifying individual in his capacity as trustee. (Abraham, Stephen)
August 18, 2020 Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Scott Harris.(Attorney Stephen E Abraham added to party Scott Harris(pty:dft))(Abraham, Stephen)
August 3, 2020 Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Amber Machowski, upon Defendant Scott Harris served on 7/25/2020, answer due 8/17/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Scott Harris - Defendant in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Shahriari, Peter)
July 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NEW CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
July 9, 2020 Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Scott Harris. (ghap)
July 9, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap)
July 9, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (ghap)
July 9, 2020 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Amber Machowski, (Shahriari, Peter)
July 9, 2020 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Amber Machowski. (Shahriari, Peter)
July 9, 2020 Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Amber Machowski. (Shahriari, Peter)
July 9, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-27133838 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Amber Machowski. (Attorney Peter Shahriari added to party Amber Machowski(pty:pla))(Shahriari, Peter)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Amber Machowski v. Scott Harris et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Scott Harris
Represented By: Stephen E Abraham
Represented By: Melissa T Daugherty
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amber Machowski
Represented By: Peter Shahriari
Represented By: Anoush Hakimi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?