Wilfredo Rivas v. ABM Industry Groups, LLC
| Wilfredo Rivas |
| ABM Industry Groups, LLC, ABM Onsite Services West, Inc., ABM Onsite Services, Inc. and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive |
| 2:2020cv06212 |
| July 13, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Charles F Eick |
| George H Wu |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 24
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - SCHEDULING ORDER by Judge George H. Wu. The Court has reviewed the parties' Joint Rule 26(f) Report and finds it can set the schedule in this matter without hearing further statements from the parties. As per C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-15, the August 27, 2020, scheduling conference date is taken off calendar. The Court sets the following dates: (Amended Pleadings due by 9/4/2020. Discovery cut-off 2/26/2021. Last day to hear Motions is 4/26/2021. Jury Trial set for 6/8/2021 at 09:00 AM before Judge George H. Wu. Pretrial Conference set for 5/27/2021 at 08:30 AM before Judge George H. Wu. Post-Mediation Status Conference set for 2/11/2021 at 08:30 AM before Judge George H. Wu.) (mrgo)
|
| Filing 23 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants All Defendants amending Complaint - (Discovery) JURY DEMAND, filed by Plaintiff Wilfredo Rivas(Younessi, Ramin) |
| Filing 22 Cross Defendant and Plaintiff Wilfredo Rivas' ANSWER to Crossclaim #15 filed by Cross Defendant Wilfredo Rivas.(Younessi, Ramin) |
|
Filing 21
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION by Judge George H. Wu re: Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held, Set/Reset Deadlines #17 . The Scheduling Conference in this action remains on-calendar for August 27, 2020. (mrgo)
|
| Filing 20 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 7 days, filed by Plaintiff Wilfredo Rivas.. (Younessi, Ramin) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Defendant ABM Industry Groups, LLC. correcting Response #18 to the Court's OSC re Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Nhan, Raymond) |
| Filing 18 RESPONSE filed by Defendant ABM Industry Groups, LLC in Response to the Court's OSC re Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Nhan, Raymond) |
|
Filing 17
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION by Judge George H. Wu. (Show Cause Response due by 8/20/2020.) (mrgo)
|
| Filing 16 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Defendant ABM Industry Groups, LLC. correcting Crossclaim #15 Against Plaintiff Wilfredo Rivas (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Nhan, Raymond) |
| Filing 15 CROSSCLAIM against Plaintiff Wilfredo Rivas ABM Industry Groups, LLC, filed by defendant ABM Industry Groups, LLC.(Nhan, Raymond) |
| Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by defendant ABM Industry Groups, LLC.(Nhan, Raymond) |
| Filing 13 Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss defendants ABM Onsite Services West, Inc., ABM Onsite Services, Inc. filed by defendant ABM Industry Groups, LLC.(Nhan, Raymond) |
| Filing 12 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Ramin R Younessi counsel for Plaintiff Wilfredo Rivas. Adding Jessica P. Gomez as counsel of record for Wilfredo Rivas for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Wilfredo Rivas. (Younessi, Ramin) |
| Filing 11 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Ramin R Younessi counsel for Plaintiff Wilfredo Rivas. Adding Liliuokalani H. Martin as counsel of record for Wilfredo Rivas for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Wilfredo Rivas. (Younessi, Ramin) |
|
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge George H. Wu. (Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 8/13/2020. Scheduling Conference set for 8/27/2020 at 08:30 AM before Judge George H. Wu.) (mrgo)
|
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER RE FINAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCES FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS by Judge George H. Wu. (lom)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (jtil) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Wilfredo Rivas in Los Angeles Superior Court on 5/21/2020, attached as Exhibit A. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 DECLARATION of Allison Nelson re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant ABM Industry Groups, LLC. (Nhan, Raymond) |
| Filing 5 DECLARATION of Sheri Arabkhazaei re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant ABM Industry Groups, LLC. (Nhan, Raymond) |
| Filing 4 DECLARATION of Raymond J. Nhan re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant ABM Industry Groups, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit "A" - Pages 4-26, #2 Exhibit "B" - Pages 27-28, #3 Exhibit "C" - Pages 29-39)(Nhan, Raymond) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by defendant ABM Industry Groups, LLC, identifying ABM Industry Groups, LLC; BlackRock, Inc.; State Street Corporation; FMR, LLC; The Vanguard Group, Inc.. (Nhan, Raymond) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant ABM Industry Groups, LLC. (Nhan, Raymond) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 20STCV19354 Receipt No: ACACDC-27179719 - Fee: $400, filed by defendant ABM Industry Groups, LLC. (Attorney Raymond J Nhan added to party ABM Industry Groups, LLC(pty:dft))(Nhan, Raymond) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
