Michael H. Weiss, P.C., et al v. Berkley Insurance Company, et al
| Michael H. Weiss, P.C. and Michael H. Weiss |
| Berkley Insurance Company and Does 1-10 |
| 2:2020cv06267 |
| July 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John A Kronstadt |
| Patrick J Walsh |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 23
AMENDED ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b)/26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Counsel shall file a Joint Report consistent with this Order. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 10/23/2020. Scheduling Conference set for 11/2/2020 at 11:30 AM #21 . (jp)
|
| Filing 22 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Berkley Insurance Company, identifying Berkley Insurance Company, a Delaware Corporation; Michael H. Weiss, P.C., a California professional corporation; Michael H. Weiss, an individual. (O'Leary, Lynn) |
|
Filing 21
ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b)/26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Counsel shall file a Joint Report consistent with this Order. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 10/23/2020. Scheduling Conference set for 11/2/2020 at 11:30 AM. (vv)
|
| Filing 20 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #19 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. Other error(s) with document(s): Counsel shall file the notice on or before 8/24/2020. Failure to file the notice may result in the document being stricken.. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (et) |
| Filing 19 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Berkley Insurance Company.(O'Leary, Lynn) |
|
Filing 18
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT (DKT. #12 , #15 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Defendants' deadline to answer, move to dismiss, or otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended to 8/20/2020. (et)
|
|
Filing 17
NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES RE STIPULATION (DKT. #12 ) AND PROPOSED ORDER (DKT. #15 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt: Pursuant to L.R. 52-4.1, a proposed order shall be electronically filed as a separate attachment to any document seeking Court approval. When not filed with the document seeking approval, counsel shall file a "Notice of Lodging of Proposed Order Re..." with the proposed order electronically filed as an attachment to the Notice. The Court notes the Stipulation was filed without a proposed order attached, and the Proposed Order was filed without a Notice of Lodging. The Court accepts the Stipulation and the Proposed Order as filed, but counsel must comply with the Local Rules and the Court's Standing Orders on future filings, or the documents may be stricken. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cw) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
|
Filing 16
STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT upon filing of the complaint by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court's Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (cw)
|
| Filing 15 Proposed Order Extending Time to Respond filed by Defendant Berkley Insurance Company re: Stipulation Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less), #12 (O'Leary, Lynn) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 19-03. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Consuelo B. Marshall to Judge John A. Kronstadt for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:20-cv-06267 JAK (PJWx). (esa)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 19-03. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Dean D. Pregerson to Judge Consuelo B. Marshall for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:20-cv-06267 CBM (PJWx). (esa)
|
| Filing 12 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Berkley Insurance Company answer now due 8/20/2020, filed by Defendant Berkley Insurance Company.(Attorney Lynn A O'Leary added to party Berkley Insurance Company(pty:dft))(O'Leary, Lynn) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Michael H. Weiss, P.C., Michael H. Weiss, upon Defendant Berkley Insurance Company served on 7/16/2020, answer due 8/6/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Berkley Insurance Company in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Bodell, Gregory) |
| Filing 10 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Berkley Insurance Company. (esa) |
| Filing 9 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 filed by Plaintiffs Michael H. Weiss, P.C., Michael H. Weiss. (Bodell, Gregory) |
| Filing 8 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs All Plaintiffs, identifying Michael H. Weiss, P.C., Michael H. Weiss, and Berkley Insurance Company. (Bodell, Gregory) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons. The following error(s) was found: Summons is not directed to the defendant(s). The defendants name must appear in the To:section of the summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (esa) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dean D. Pregerson and Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh. (esa) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 filed by Plaintiff Michael H. Weiss, P.C.. (Bodell, Gregory) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Michael H. Weiss, P.C.. (Bodell, Gregory) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-27204870 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Michael H. Weiss, P.C.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 to Complaint, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2 to Complaint) (Attorney Gregory S Bodell added to party Michael H. Weiss, P.C.(pty:pla))(Bodell, Gregory) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
