Grace Cho v. Fatemeh Karimghafab et al
| GRACE CHO |
| MARK MILLMAN, FATEMEH KARIMGHAFAB doing business as BUTTERFLY BEAUTY SALON and Does 1 to 10 |
| 2:2020cv06285 |
| July 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Patricia Donahue |
| Dolly M Gee |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - ORDER DISMISSING ACTION by Judge Dolly M. Gee: In light of Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed on 12/28/2020 #14 , the Court hereby DISMISSES this action with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1). The Order to Show Cause dated 12/17/2020 #13 is discharged. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)
|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by plaintiff Grace Cho. (Kim, Jason) |
|
Filing 13
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Dolly M. Gee: The Court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before 12/28/2020 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a written response on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. This action will be dismissed if a written response demonstrating good cause is not filed by the date indicated above. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)
|
|
Filing 12
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - ORDER DECLINING TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFF'S STATE LAW CLAIMS by Judge Dolly M. Gee: The Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause in writing why the Court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim asserted in the Complaint #10 . Having reviewed and considered Plaintiff's response to the Court's Order to Show Cause #11 , the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claims. The Court therefore dismisses the state law claims without prejudice. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)
|
| Filing 11 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Grace Choto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, Set/Reset Deadlines, #10 re: Supplemental Jurisdiction (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration)(Kim, Jason) |
|
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFF'S STATE LAW CLAIMS by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Plaintiff shall file a Response to this Order to Show Cause by July 31, 2020. See minute order for details. (lom)
|
| Filing 9 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (kti) |
|
Filing 8
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Fatemeh Karimghafab, Mark Millman. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (et) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 GRACE CHO. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff GRACE CHO. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-27220102 - Fee: $400. (Attorney Jason J Kim added to party GRACE CHO(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
