Twila Denise Bracy v. Andrew Saul
| Twila Denise Bracy |
| Saul Andrew and Andrew Saul |
| 2:2020cv06304 |
| July 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alexander F MacKinnon |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon for all further proceedings. Please use the case number CV20-6304 AFM on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (sn)
|
|
Filing 14
CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Andrew Saul. (Attorney Jennifer A Kenney added to party Andrew Saul(pty:dft))(Kenney, Jennifer)
|
|
Filing 13
CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Plaintiff Twila Denise Bracy. (Rohlfing, Lawrence)
|
|
Filing 12
PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Twila Denise Bracy, upon Defendant Andrew Saul served on 7/27/2020, answer due 11/24/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Attorney General. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to General Counsel. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Rohlfing, Lawrence)
|
|
Filing 11
60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Andrew Saul. (es)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Twila Denise Bracy, (Rohlfing, Lawrence)
|
|
Filing 10
SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER REGARDING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (es)
|
|
Filing 9
(In Chambers): ORDER RE: PROCEDURES IN SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL1 by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon: *See document for details.* (es)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon: Granting #3 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). (es)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank and referred to Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (ghap)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Twila Denise Bracy, (Rohlfing, Lawrence)
|
|
Filing 4
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Twila Denise Bracy. (Rohlfing, Lawrence)
|
|
Filing 3
REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Twila Denise Bracy. (Rohlfing, Lawrence)
|
|
Filing 2
Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Twila Denise Bracy. (Rohlfing, Lawrence)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff Twila Denise Bracy. (Attorney Lawrence D Rohlfing added to party Twila Denise Bracy(pty:pla))(Rohlfing, Lawrence)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
