Steven M. Hunter v. Felipe Martinez, Jr.
| Steven M. Hunter |
| Felipe Martinez, Jr. |
| 2:2020cv06311 |
| July 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Shashi H Kewalramani |
| John A Kronstadt |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 JUDGMENT by Judge John A. Kronstadt, Related to: Order Dismissing Case Without Prejudice #6 . IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (hr) |
Filing 6
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Judge John A. Kronstadt. The Court GRANTS Plaintiff's request and DISMISSES this action, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, under Rule 41(a). The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to file a blank CV-27 form with this Order so that Plaintiff may use it to should he choose to file a separate lawsuit under 28 U.S.C. 2241. (see document for further details)(see attached CV-27 Form) (hr)
|
| Filing 5 RESPONSE to Order to Show Cause #4 filed by Plaintiff Steven M. Hunter (hr) |
| Filing 4 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani: RE #2 Notice of Filing Complaint Without Prepayment of Filing Fees or REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (CV-93). Order To Show Cause Why Case Should Not Be Dismissed And To Pay Filing Fee Or Apply To Proceed In Forma Pauperis Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why his Complaint should notbe dismissed for failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted and failure to follow Court rules. Plaintiff can satisfy this order by, no later than August 4, 2020, filing a First Amended Complaint ("FAC") on this Court's CV-066 form, which the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff with this order, and by either paying the $350 filing fee or applying to proceed IFPon a CV-60P form, which the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff with this order. (Attachments: #1 CV Rights Packet) (dc) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/22/2020: #2 Supplement Dismissal Notice) (dc). |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and referred to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (jtil) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING OF COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES OR REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (CV-93) filed by Plaintiff Steven M. Hunter. (jtil) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Steven M. Hunter against Defendant Felipe Martinez, Jr., pursuant to 42 USC 1983. Case assigned to Judge John A. Kronstadt and referred to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (jtil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Steven M. Hunter v. Felipe Martinez, Jr. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Steven M. Hunter | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Felipe Martinez, Jr. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
