James Jancales et al v. HD Supply Inc et al
| James Jancales and Robert Vose |
| HD Supply Inc, HD Supply Management, Inc., HD Supply, Inc. and Does 1-10, inclusive |
| 2:2020cv06366 |
| July 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| R Gary Klausner |
| Patrick J Walsh |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge R. Gary Klausner. A scheduling conference has been placed on calendar for December 14, 2020 at 9:00 a.m. The Conference will be held pursuant to F.R.Civ. P. 16(b). Trial counsel must be present and there are no telephonic appearances. See order for details. (lom)
|
| Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant HD Supply Management, Inc..(Krauthamer, Danielle) |
| Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant HD Supply, Inc..(Krauthamer, Danielle) |
| Filing 12 Text Only Entry: The Court has reviewed the Stipulation for Extension of Time to File Response as to Complaint #11 filed on August 4, 2020. Counsel for plaintiff(s) shall immediately file proof of service of the summons and complaint. Proof of service must be filed within 5 days of service. See Standing Order #10 . THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sw) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 11 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to HD Supply Management, Inc. answer now due 8/25/2020; HD Supply, Inc. answer now due 8/25/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendants HD Supply Management, Inc.; HD Supply, Inc..(Attorney Danielle Samantha Krauthamer added to party HD Supply Management, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Danielle Samantha Krauthamer added to party HD Supply, Inc.(pty:dft))(Krauthamer, Danielle) |
|
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (sw)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 19-03-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:19-cv-07924 RGK(PJWx). Case transferred from Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott and Judge Stephen V. Wilson to Judge R. Gary Klausner and Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:20-cv-06366 RGK(PJWx). Signed by Judge R. Gary Klausner (rn)
|
|
Filing 8
NEW CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendants HD Supply Management, Inc., HD Supply, Inc. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (car) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs James Jancales, Robert Vose, (Shem-Tov, Shalem) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs James Jancales, Robert Vose. (Shem-Tov, Shalem) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by plaintiffs James Jancales, Robert Vose. (Shem-Tov, Shalem) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-27250844 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiffs James Jancales, Robert Vose. (Attorney Shalem Shem-Tov added to party James Jancales(pty:pla), Attorney Shalem Shem-Tov added to party Robert Vose (pty:pla))(Shem-Tov, Shalem) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
