James Shayler v. S and E 786 Enterprise, LLC et al
James Shayler |
DOES 1-10, S & E 786 Enterprise, LLC and S and E 786 Enterprise, LLC |
2:2020cv06383 |
July 17, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Pedro V Castillo |
Stephen V Wilson |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 STIPULATION to Set Aside Default as to Defendant S and E 786 Enterprise, LLC filed by Defendant S and E 786 Enterprise, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Setting Aside Default)(Attorney Jon Ali Atabek added to party S and E 786 Enterprise, LLC(pty:dft))(Atabek, Jon) |
Filing 13 IN CHAMBERS ORDER-TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Judge Stephen V. Wilson re: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION #10 - The OSC is DISCHARGED. The plaintiff is granted two weeks, to and including 09/16/2020, to move for default judgment. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (pc) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 12 DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a) as to S and E 786 Enterprise, LLC a California Limited Liability Company. (mrgo) |
Filing 11 First REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant S and E 786 Enterprise, LLC filed by plaintiff James Shayler. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Exhibit) (Hakimi, Anoush) |
Filing 10 MINUTES: IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Stephen V. Wilson: The file in this case lacks the papers that would show it is being timely prosecuted, as reflected below. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing no later than September 1, 2020 why this action should not be dismissed as to all remaining defendants for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will accept one of the following, if it is filed on or before the above date, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligently. (See minutes for further details) (yl) |
Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Shayler, upon Defendant S and E 786 Enterprise, LLC served on 8/1/2020, answer due 8/24/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jafar Rashid - Registered Agent for Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Shahriari, Peter) |
Filing 8 NEW CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant S and E 786 Enterprise, LLC. (ghap) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (ghap) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff James Shayler, (Shahriari, Peter) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff James Shayler. (Shahriari, Peter) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff James Shayler. (Shahriari, Peter) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-27253560 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff James Shayler. (Attorney Peter Shahriari added to party James Shayler(pty:pla))(Shahriari, Peter) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.