Tynesha Dixon v. The City of Los Angeles et al
Tynesha Dixon |
Officer Guerrero, Officer Navarrete, Officer Gabaldon, Lieutenant Perry, Officer Garcia, Detective Gibson, Officer Shonafelt, Janette Roman, The City of Los Angeles, Michael Mitchell, Officer Magan, Officer Nelson and Does 1-50 |
2:2020cv06464 |
July 20, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Dolly M Gee |
Patrick J Walsh |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, 26(f)] by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 10/16/2020. Scheduling Conference set for 10/30/2020 at 9:30 a.m. (See order for details.) (kti) |
Filing 14 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by DEFENDANTS Gabaldon, Guerrero, Magan, Navarrete, Janette Roman, The City of Los Angeles, (Rathbun, J) |
Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by DEFENDANTS Gabaldon, Guerrero, Magan, Navarrete, Janette Roman, The City of Los Angeles.(Attorney J Edwin Rathbun, Jr added to party Gabaldon(pty:dft), Attorney J Edwin Rathbun, Jr added to party Guerrero(pty:dft), Attorney J Edwin Rathbun, Jr added to party Magan(pty:dft), Attorney J Edwin Rathbun, Jr added to party Navarrete(pty:dft), Attorney J Edwin Rathbun, Jr added to party Janette Roman(pty:dft), Attorney J Edwin Rathbun, Jr added to party The City of Los Angeles(pty:dft))(Rathbun, J) |
Filing 12 SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Plaintiff Tynesha Dixon, upon Defendant The City of Los Angeles served on 8/26/2020, answer due 9/16/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Clerks Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Haysbert, Nazareth) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by plaintiff Tynesha Dixon. Related Case(s): 20-cv-06465-DMG-PJW (Haysbert, Nazareth) |
Filing 10 21-Day Summons Issued re Complaint #1 as to Defendants The City of Los Angeles, Officer Navarrete, Janette Roman, Officer Guerrero, Officer Magan, Officer Nelson, Officer Shonafelt, Officer Gabaldon, Officer Garcia, Detective Gibson, Lieutenant Perry, Michael Mitchell and Does 1-50. (gk) |
Filing 9 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti) |
Filing 8 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Tynesha Dixon. (Haysbert, Nazareth) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #4 . The following error(s) was found: Please remove et al from the caption of the summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (ghap) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh. (ghap) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Tynesha Dixon. (Haysbert, Nazareth) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Tynesha Dixon, (Haysbert, Nazareth) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Tynesha Dixon. (Haysbert, Nazareth) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-27282448 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Tynesha Dixon. (Attorney Nazareth M Haysbert added to party Tynesha Dixon(pty:pla))(Haysbert, Nazareth) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.