Ebby Bakhtiar v. FCA US LLC et al
Plaintiff: Ebby Bakhtiar
Defendant: Santa Monica Chrysler Jeep Dodge and Ram, MOPAR MOTORS, FCA US LLC and DOES 1 through 100, Inclusive
Case Number: 2:2020cv06522
Filed: July 22, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John E McDermott
Referring Judge: Otis D Wright
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANTS TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT #18 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Plaintiff has until October 1, 2020 to file his Second Amended Complaint. Defendants have until October 23, 20202 to file their responses to the Second Amended Complaint. (lc)
September 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 18 Joint STIPULATION for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff Ebby Bakhtiar. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Galloway, Alexa)
August 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 17 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Based on the stipulation of the parties filed on August 27, 2020 #15 , and good cause appearing therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that: Defendant Santa Monica Chrysler Jeep Dodge and Ram shall have until September 24, 2020, to file its response to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint. (lc)
August 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 16 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Nickolaus E Buchholz counsel for Defendant Santa Monica Chrysler Jeep Dodge and Ram. Adding Nickolaus E. Buchholz as counsel of record for Santa Monica Chrysler Jeep Dodge and Ram for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Santa Monica Chrysler Jeep Dodge and Ram. (Attorney Nickolaus E Buchholz added to party Santa Monica Chrysler Jeep Dodge and Ram(pty:dft))(Buchholz, Nickolaus)
August 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 15 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Santa Monica Chrysler Jeep Dodge and Ram answer now due 9/24/2020, filed by Defendant Santa Monica Chrysler Jeep Dodge and Ram. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Attorney Kevin Robert Crisp added to party Santa Monica Chrysler Jeep Dodge and Ram(pty:dft))(Crisp, Kevin)
August 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 14 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants All Defendants amending Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Plaintiff Ebby Bakhtiar (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Galloway, Alexa)
August 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER by Judge Otis D. Wright, II Granting Application of Non-Resident Attorney Stephen A. D'Aunoy to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant FCA US LLC, designating Ryan E. Cosgrove as local counsel #10 . (gk)
August 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER by Judge Otis D. Wright, II Granting Application of Non-Resident Attorney Thomas L. Azar to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant FCA US LLC, designating Ryan E. Cosgrove as local counsel #11 . (gk)
July 31, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Thomas Louis Azar, Jr. to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant FCA US LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-27447179) filed by defendant FCA US LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificates of Admission, #2 Proposed Order) (Cosgrove, Ryan)
July 31, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Stephen Anthony D'Aunoy to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant FCA US LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-27446975) filed by defendant FCA US LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Certficates of Admission, #2 Proposed Order) (Cosgrove, Ryan)
July 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Defendant FCA US LLCs current deadline to answer Plaintiffs Complaint is July 29, 2020. Based on the stipulation of the parties filed on July 28, 2020 #8 , and good cause appearing therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint on or before August 15, 2020, and FCA shall file its answer or motion to dismiss in this case on or before September 24, 2020. (lc)
July 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to September 24, 2020 filed by Defendant FCA US LLC FCA US LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Cosgrove, Ryan)
July 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. Counsel are STRONGLY encouraged to review the Central Districts website for additional information.. The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. Please refer to the Judges procedures and schedules for detailed instructions for submission of sealed documents. (lc)
July 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Thomas L. Azar Jr. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (jtil)
July 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Stephen A. DAunoy. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (jtil)
July 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil)
July 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (jtil)
July 22, 2020 Opinion or Order CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Ebby Bakhtiar in Los Angeles Superior Court on 4/29/2020, attached as Exhibit A. (jtil)
July 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT AND CERTIFICATION OF INTERESTED ENTITIES OR PERSONS filed by Defendant FCA US LLC identifying Fiat Chrysler Automobiles N.V. as Corporate Parent. (Cosgrove, Ryan)
July 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, case number 20STCV16616 Receipt No: ACACDC-27315463 - Fee: $400, filed by defendant FCA US LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Notice of Removal, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Ryan E Cosgrove added to party FCA US LLC(pty:dft))(Cosgrove, Ryan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ebby Bakhtiar v. FCA US LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ebby Bakhtiar
Represented By: Thomas Vincent Girardi
Represented By: Keith David Griffin
Represented By: Alexa Frances Galloway
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Santa Monica Chrysler Jeep Dodge and Ram
Represented By: Nickolaus E Buchholz
Represented By: Kevin Robert Crisp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MOPAR MOTORS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FCA US LLC
Represented By: Ryan E Cosgrove
Represented By: Ryan E. Cosgrove
Represented By: Stephen A. D'Aunoy
Represented By: Thomas L. Azar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1 through 100, Inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?