Daniel Perez, Jr. v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Daniel Perez, Jr. |
| Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi |
| 2:2020cv06576 |
| July 23, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Paul L Abrams |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. § 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 23 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Attorney Fees Motion for Attorneys Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. 2412 filed by Plaintiff Daniel Perez, Jr.. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Local Rule 7-3, #8 Certificate of Service, #9 Proposed Order) (Barasch, Stuart) |
| Filing 22 JUDGMENT FOR VOLUNTARY REMAND PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. 405(g) by Judge Josephine L. Staton. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above-captioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent with the Stipulation to Remand. #21 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (es) |
Filing 21
ORDER GRANTING VOLUNTARY REMAND PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. 405(g) AND ENTRY OF JUDGMENT #20 by Judge Josephine L. Staton. (es)
|
| Filing 20 Joint STIPULATION to Remand Case to US Agency for Further Proceedings Pursuant to Sentence Four 42 U.S.C. 405(g) filed by Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Naicker, Tina) Modified on 8/18/2021 (es). |
|
Filing 19
ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. Final Joint Stipulation Filing Date: JULY 14, 2021. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. #18 (ch)
|
| Filing 18 Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Joint Stipulation filed by Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Naicker, Tina) |
| Filing 17 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (SOCIAL SECURITY) OF DANIEL PEREZ JR (mj) filed by Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. (Attachments: #1 Certification Page, #2 Court Transcript Index, #3 Documents Related to Administrative Process Including Transcript of Oral Hearing, if applicable, #4 Payment Documents and Decisions, #5 Jurisdictional Documents and Notices, #6 Non Disability Related Development, #7 Disability Related Development, #8 Medical Records Part 1, #9 Medical Records Part 2, #10 Medical Records Part 3, #11 Medical Records Part 4, #12 Medical Records Part 5)(Naicker, Tina) |
| Filing 16 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 (mj) filed by Defendant Commissioner of Social Security.(Naicker, Tina) |
| Filing 15 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Daniel Perez, Jr., re Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive-form only-no proceeding held #9 served on Plaintiff's Settlement Proposal. (Barasch, Stuart) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. #13 (ch)
|
| Filing 13 Joint NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Extension of Time to File Plaintiff's Settlement Proposal filed by Plaintiff Daniel Perez, Jr.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Barasch, Stuart) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING SERVICE OF CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. (Naicker, Tina) |
| Filing 11 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. (Attorney Tina Naicker added to party Commissioner of Social Security(pty:dft))(Naicker, Tina) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Daniel Perez, Jr., upon Defendant Commissioner of Social Security served on 8/6/2020, answer due 10/5/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to C. Torres. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Eddie Anderson. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Ronnie. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Barasch, Stuart) |
|
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. (ch)
|
| Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. (dml) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams: granting #4 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). (dml)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and referred to Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. (car) |
| Filing 5 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Daniel Perez, Jr., (Barasch, Stuart) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Daniel Perez, Jr.. (Barasch, Stuart) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Daniel Perez, Jr.. (Barasch, Stuart) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Daniel Perez, Jr.. (Barasch, Stuart) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff Daniel Perez, Jr.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Attorney Stuart Barasch added to party Daniel Perez, Jr.(pty:pla))(Barasch, Stuart) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
