Marlene Romero v. The United States Postal Service et al
| Marlene Romero |
| United States Postal Service, Does 1-10, inclusive and The United States Postal Service |
| 2:2020cv06685 |
| July 27, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Philip S Gutierrez |
| Michael R Wilner |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant The United States Postal Service, OF NOTICE TO STATE COURT AND ADVERSE PARTY OF REMOVAL OF CIVIL ACTION TO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT served on 09/02/2020. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Proof of Service)(Finn, Kevin) |
Filing 9
ORDER by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: the following document(s) be STRICKEN for failure to comply with the Local Rules, General Order and/or the Courts Case Management Order: Motion To Dismiss #6 , for the following reasons: Hearing information is missing, incorrect, or not timely. Other: The hearing date selected is closed for NEW motions. See Calendars>Motion Calendar. (bm)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant The United States Postal Service. Motion set for hearing on 10/19/2020 at 01:30 PM before Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Finn, Kevin) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Motion to Dismiss #6 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Applications/Ex Parte Applications/Motions /Petitions/Requests-Dismiss Case. Hearing information is missing, incorrect, or not timely. Other error(s) with document(s): Motion is noticed for a date that is closed on the court's calendar. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (bm) |
| Filing 6 DOCUMENT STRICKEN ON 8/11/2020. DEFENDANT UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE'S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO DISMISS; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES; DECLARATION OF KEVIN B. FINN filed by Defendant The United States Postal Service Proposed Hearing Date: October 5, 2020; Time: 1:30pm - Courtroom 6A (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Finn, Kevin) Modified on 8/11/2020 (bm). |
|
Filing 5
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (ji)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (et) |
| CONFORMED E-FILED COMPLAINT against Defendants The United States Postal Service, Does 1 through 10, inclusive. Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Marlene Romero. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 11/22/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 . (et) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant United States Postal Service. (Finn, Kevin) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Stanley Mosk Courthouse, case number 19STCV41984 No Fee Required - US Government, filed by Defendant United States Postal Service. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 Sums & Cmplt, #2 Proof of Service) (Attorney Kevin Bruce Finn added to party United States Postal Service(pty:dft))(Finn, Kevin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
