Allied World Surplus Lines Insurance Company v. Norholm Builders, Inc. et al
| Allied World Surplus Lines Insurance Company |
| Norholm Builders, Inc., Brad Miller, Suzanne Hiatt and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 2:2020cv06743 |
| July 28, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Pedro V Castillo |
| John W Holcomb |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
ORDER OF THE CHIEF JUDGE (#20-099) approved by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Pursuant to the recommended procedure adopted by the Court for the creation of thecalendar of Judge John W. Holcomb,IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following cases are hereby transferred from thecalendar of Judge Dale S. Fischer to the calendar of John W. Holcomb: The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:20-cv-06743 JWH (PVCx). (esa)
|
| Filing 19 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Allied World Surplus Lines Insurance Companyto Order to Show Cause #12 (Newman, Gregory) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL filed by plaintiff Allied World Surplus Lines Insurance Company pursuant to FRCP 41a(1) as to Brad Miller. (Newman, Gregory) |
| Filing 17 STIPULATION for Judgment as to Brad Miller filed by plaintiff Allied World Surplus Lines Insurance Company.(Newman, Gregory) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL filed by plaintiff Allied World Surplus Lines Insurance Company pursuant to FRCP 41a(1) as to Suzanne Hiatt. (Newman, Gregory) |
| Filing 15 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Norholm Builders, Inc. answer now due 9/28/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Allied World Surplus Lines Insurance Company.(Newman, Gregory) |
| Filing 14 STIPULATION for Judgment as to Suzanne Hiatt filed by plaintiff Allied World Surplus Lines Insurance Company.(Newman, Gregory) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Allied World Surplus Lines Insurance Company, upon Defendant Suzanne Hiatt acknowledgment sent by Plaintiff on 8/19/2020, answer due 9/9/2020. Acknowledgment of Service signed by Clayton Hall, Attorneys for Suzanne Hiatt. (Newman, Gregory) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Dale S. Fischer. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 9/18/2020. (rfi)
|
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Allied World Surplus Lines Insurance Company, upon Defendant Norholm Builders, Inc. served on 8/6/2020, answer due 8/27/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Poul Norholm, Agent for Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons returned. (Newman, Gregory) |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Allied World Surplus Lines Insurance Company, identifying Allied World Specialty Insurance Company; AW Underwriters, Inc.; Allied World Insurance Company; Allied World Assurance Holdings (U.S.), Inc.; Allied World Assurance Holdings (Ireland) Ltd.; Allied World Assurance Company, Ltd.; Allied World Assurance Holdings Company I, Ltd.; Allied World Assurance Holdings Company, Ltd.; 1102952 B.C. Unlimited Liability Company; OCM Goldfish, Inc.; Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited. (Newman, Gregory) |
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (vv)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Suzanne Hiatt, Brad Miller, Norholm Builders, Inc. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Hee Sung Yoon on behalf of Plaintiff Allied World Surplus Lines Insurance Company (Yoon, Hee) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Allied World Surplus Lines Insurance Company. (Newman, Gregory) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Allied World Surplus Lines Insurance Company. (Newman, Gregory) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-27392847 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Allied World Surplus Lines Insurance Company. (Attorney Gregory J Newman added to party Allied World Surplus Lines Insurance Company(pty:pla))(Newman, Gregory) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
