George Jones v. Jack in the Box Properties LLC et al
| George Jones |
| DOES 1-10 and Jack in the Box Properties LLC |
| 2:2020cv06755 |
| July 28, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dale S Fischer |
| Michael R Wilner |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY Re: First REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant Jack in the Box Properties LLC #11 . The Clerk cannot enter the requested relief as: Answer on file dated 8/31/2020, see dkt no. #12 . (jp) |
Filing 14
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The Joint Report must include the completed Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates. Lead trial counsel are ordered to appear in person unless counsel have been excused by the Court. Scheduling Conference set for 10/19/2020 at 11:00 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (rfi)
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Jack in the Box Properties LLC, identifying Tri - P's Management Corporation. (Abraham, Stephen) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Jack in the Box Properties LLC.(Attorney Stephen E Abraham added to party Jack in the Box Properties LLC(pty:dft))(Abraham, Stephen) |
| Filing 11 First REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant Jack in the Box Properties LLC filed by plaintiff George Jones. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Exhibit) (Hakimi, Anoush) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff George Jones, upon Defendant Jack in the Box Properties LLC served on 8/9/2020, answer due 8/31/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon c/o Suzie Vang - Registered Agent for Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by method of service not specified.Original Summons NOT returned. (Shahriari, Peter) |
| Filing 9 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (vv) |
|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (vv)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Jack in the Box Properties LLC. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (et) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff George Jones, (Shahriari, Peter) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff George Jones. (Shahriari, Peter) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff George Jones. (Shahriari, Peter) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-27393988 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff George Jones. (Attorney Peter Shahriari added to party George Jones(pty:pla))(Shahriari, Peter) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
