1940 Carmen, LLC, et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
| 1940 Carmen, LLC and Alexander Stein |
| Cherilyn Davis, DOES 1-10 inclusive and City of Los Angeles |
| 2:2020cv06772 |
| July 29, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Charles F Eick |
| Otis D Wright |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The parties are hereby ORDERED to SHOW CAUSE, in writing only, no later than October 2, 2020, why this case no. 2:20-cv-08130, 1940 Carmen, LLC et al. v. City of Los Angeles et al., should not be consolidated with related case no. 2:20-cv-06772, 1940 Carmen,LLC et al. v. City of Los Angeles et al. The parties must file their responses in case no. 2:20-cv-06772. No hearing will be held. The Court will discharge this order upon the filing of the Parties' responses. (lc)
|
|
Filing 9
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs 1940 Carmen, LLC, Alexander Stein. (Weiser, Frank)
|
|
Filing 8
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. Counsel are STRONGLY encouraged to review the Central Districts website for additional information.. The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. Please refer to the Judges procedures and schedules for detailed instructions for submission of sealed documents. (lc)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: The Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) is missing or incomplete. All civil actions presented for filing must be accompanied by a completed Civil Cover Sheet. See Local Rule 3-1. Counsel must file a completed Civil Cover Sheet immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (jtil)
|
|
Filing 6
21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant City of Los Angeles. (jtil)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (jtil)
|
|
Filing 3
Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties, #2 filed by Plaintiffs 1940 Carmen, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, Alexander Stein. (Weiser, Frank)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs 1940 Carmen, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, Alexander Stein, identifying Plaintiff 1940 Carmen, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company; Plaintiff Alexander Stein; Defendant City of Los Angeles, a municipal corporation; Defendant Cherilyn Davis. (Weiser, Frank)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-27402196 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiffs 1940 Carmen, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, Alexander Stein. (Attorney Frank A Weiser added to party 1940 Carmen, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company(pty:pla), Attorney Frank A Weiser added to party Alexander Stein(pty:pla))(Weiser, Frank)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
