Adam Ghadiri v. Craigs Automotive et al
| Adam Ghadiri |
| KISTLER FAMILY TRUST, DAN'S GARAGE, INC., Cody Hughes, KISTLER CRAIG & MOONYEAN TRS, CRAIGS AUTOMOTIVE DBA DAN'S GARAGE, Craigs Automotive a business entity doing business as Dans Garage, Kistler Graig and Moonyean TRS and Dans Garage Inc. |
| 2:2020cv06789 |
| July 29, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Southern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Douglas F. McCormick. New Case Number 8:20-cv-01394 MWF (DFMx). (lh) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Adam Ghadiri, identifying CRAIGS AUTOMOTIVE DBA DAN'S GARAGE; CODY HUGHES; DAN'S GARAGE INC.; KISTLER FAMILY TRUST; KISTLER GRAIG & MOONYEAN TRS. (Bakhos, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Adam Ghadiri. (Bakhos, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-27410471 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Adam Ghadiri. (Attorney Joseph Bakhos added to party Adam Ghadiri(pty:pla))(Bakhos, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
