Rastaclat, LLC v. Drihp LLC
Plaintiff: Rastaclat, LLC
Defendant: Drihp LLC
Case Number: 2:2020cv06794
Filed: July 29, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Patrick J Walsh
Referring Judge: George H Wu
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 25, 2020 Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Drihp LLC.(Hughes, Jennifer)
August 20, 2020 Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Rastaclat, LLC, upon Defendant Drihp LLC served on 8/5/2020, answer due 8/26/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jeff Sirolly, General Counsel in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Holbrow, Willmore)
August 20, 2020 Filing 11 Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Response as to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by defendant Drihp LLC.(Attorney Jennifer Hughes added to party Drihp LLC(pty:dft))(Hughes, Jennifer)
August 4, 2020 Filing 10 STANDING ORDER RE FINAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCES FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS BEFORE JUDGE GEORGE H. WU. (See document for details) (mrgo)
July 31, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTICE AND ORDER REGARDING TRANSFER AND/OR REASSIGNMENT OF PATENT CASE by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case transferred from Judge Fernando M. Olguin to Judge George H. Wu for all further proceedings. Case number now reads 2:20-cv-06794 GW(PJWx). (rn)
July 30, 2020 Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Drihp LLC. (et)
July 30, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et)
July 30, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh. (et)
July 29, 2020 Filing 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Rastaclat, LLC. (Holbrow, Willmore)
July 29, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Rastaclat, LLC, identifying Rastaclat, LLC. (Holbrow, Willmore)
July 29, 2020 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Rastaclat, LLC. (Holbrow, Willmore)
July 29, 2020 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Rastaclat, LLC. (Holbrow, Willmore)
July 29, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-27412055 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Rastaclat, LLC. (Attorney Willmore F Holbrow, III added to party Rastaclat, LLC(pty:pla))(Holbrow, Willmore)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rastaclat, LLC v. Drihp LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rastaclat, LLC
Represented By: Willmore F Holbrow, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Drihp LLC
Represented By: Don Erik Franzen
Represented By: Jennifer Hughes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?