Donald Corhn v. Securitas Security Services USA, Inc., et al
| Donald Corhn |
| Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. and Does 1 through 50, inclusive |
| 2:2020cv06865 |
| July 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| George H Wu |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - SCHEDULING ORDER by Judge George H. Wu: The Court has reviewed the parties' Joint Rule 26(f) Report (Docket No. 20) and finds it can set the schedule in this matter without hearing further statements from the parties. As per C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-15, the September 24. 2020 scheduling conference date is taken off calendar. The Court sets the following dates: 1. The parties are free to amend pleadings under Fed. R. Civ. P. 15 up to October 9, 2020. Thereafter, any further amendments must be made by motion under Rule 16. 2. Post-mediation status conference is set for March 18, 2021 at 8:30 a.m, with mediation to be completed by March 16. The parties have agreed to mediate through a private mediation service. 3. All regular discovery will be completed by April 16, 2021. By "completed," the Court means that said discovery requests must be served sufficiently early such that a motion to compel (if necessary) can be filed, heard and complied with before the cut-off date. 4. All expert discovery will be completed by May 14, 2021. The parties are to meet and agree in writing as to when initial expert reports will be exchanged and rebuttal expert reports thereafter. 5. The last day for the Court to hear any motions (other than motions in limine which will be heard at the pre-trial conference) is June 17, 2021. 6. The pre-trial conference will be held on July 15, 2021 at 8:30 a.m. 7. Jury trial will begin on July 27, 2021 at 9:00 a.m. (see document for further details) (bm)
|
| Filing 12 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 7 days, filed by Defendant Securitas Security Services USA, Inc... (Shavit, Sherry) |
|
Filing 11
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge George H. Wu:The Court sets a Scheduling Conference for September 24, 2020 at 8:30 a.m. Counsel are reminded oftheir obligations to disclose information, confer on a discovery plan, and report to the Court, as required by F.R.C.P. 26 and the Local Rules of this Court. Trial counsel are ordered to be present. A Joint 26(f) Report shall be filed with the Court no later than September 10, 2020. (lc)
|
|
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER RE FINAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCES FOR CIVIL JURY TRIAL by Judge George H. Wu (lc)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar to Judge George H. Wu for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:20-cv-06865 GW(JCx). (rn) |
| Filing 8 DECLINED STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge (Shavit, Sherry) |
| Filing 7 STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by Plaintiff Donald Corhn. (Rothman, Jay) |
| Filing 6 REMINDER NOTICE re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. Each party must file form CV-11C within the consent deadlines pursuant to L.R. 73-2. Additionally, the parties are directed to L.R. 73-2.2 Proof of Service. In any case in which only a magistrate judge is initially assigned, plaintiff must file a proof of service within 10 days of service of the summons and complaint as to each defendant. (hr) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C) (car) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. Filed in State Court on 7/28/2020 Submitted with Attachment 2 Exhibit 2 to Notice of Removal #1 .(car) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 50, inclusive, Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. Jury Demanded, filed by Defendant Donald Corhn. Filed in State Court on 6/29/2020 Submitted with Attachment 1 Exhibit 1 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. (Shavit, Sherry) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Securitas Security Services USA, Inc., identifying Securitas A.B.; Securitas Holdings, Inc.; and Securitas Security Services, Inc. (Please see Corporate Disclosure Statement). (Shavit, Sherry) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Securitas Security Services USA, Inc.. (Shavit, Sherry) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 20STCV24397 Receipt No: ACACDC-27433062 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Securitas Security Services USA, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2, #3 Declaration of Linda Brewer, #4 Proof of Service) (Attorney Sherry B Shavit added to party Securitas Security Services USA, Inc.(pty:dft))(Shavit, Sherry) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
