Laura Flores v. Capital One Bank USA, N.A. et al
| Laura Flores |
| Trans Union, LLC, Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. and Capital One Bank USA, N.A. |
| 2:2020cv06886 |
| July 31, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Steve Kim |
| Mark C Scarsi |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER OF THE CHIEF JUDGE (#OCJ 20-112) approved by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Pursuant to the recommended procedure adopted by the Court for the CREATION OF CALENDAR of Judge Mark C. Scarsi, this case is transferred from Judge Stephen V. Wilson to the calendar of Judge Mark C. Scarsi for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:20-cv-06886 MCS(SKx). (rn)
|
|
Filing 12
NEW CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar to Judge Stephen V. Wilson for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:20-cv-06886 SVW(SKx). (rn) |
| Filing 10 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Trans Union, LLC. (hr) |
| Filing 9 STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by Plaintiff Laura Flores. (Apps, Stanley) |
| Filing 8 REMINDER NOTICE re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. Each party must file form CV-11C within the consent deadlines pursuant to L.R. 73-2. Additionally, the parties are directed to L.R. 73-2.2 Proof of Service. In any case in which only a magistrate judge is initially assigned, plaintiff must file a proof of service within 10 days of service of the summons and complaint as to each defendant. (hr) |
| Filing 7 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Laura Flores. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons to Trans Union, LLC)(Apps, Stanley) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (Attachments: #1 CV11C Statement of Consent) (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error Re: Notice to Counsel (CV-20a) Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program - optional html form #4 . Incorrect form was attached to docket entry. Notice to Counsel will be re-docketed. (et) |
| Filing 4 [NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR ISSUED ON 8/3/2020, SEE DOCKET ENTRY NO. 5] NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (et) Modified on 8/3/2020 (et). |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Laura Flores, identifying Law Offices of Robert S. Gitmeid, P.C.; Law Offices of Robert S. Gitmeid & Associates, PLLC. (Apps, Stanley) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Laura Flores. (Apps, Stanley) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-27441553 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Laura Flores. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E) (Attorney Stanley Robert Apps added to party Laura Flores(pty:pla))(Apps, Stanley) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
