Andres Gomez v. Tribecca, Inc. et al
Andres Gomez |
Does 1-10 and Tribecca, Inc. |
2:2020cv06894 |
July 31, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Dale S Fischer |
Alexander F MacKinnon |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The Joint Report must include the completed Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates. Lead trial counsel are ordered to appear in person unless counsel have been excused by the Court. Scheduling Conference set for 10/26/2020 at 11:00 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (rfi) |
Filing 13 STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi) |
Filing 12 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver to Judge Dale S. Fischer for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:20-cv-06894 DSF(AFMx). (rn) |
Filing 11 DECLINED STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by Defendant Tribecca, Inc.. (Abraham, Stephen) |
Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Tribecca, Inc., identifying No other interested parties. (Abraham, Stephen) |
Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Tribecca, Inc..(Attorney Stephen E Abraham added to party Tribecca, Inc.(pty:dft))(Abraham, Stephen) |
Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Andres Gomez, upon Defendant Tribecca, Inc. served on 8/12/2020, answer due 9/2/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Agent for Service of Process: Vache Shirvanian in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 7 STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by Plaintiff Andres Gomez. (Price, Dennis) |
Filing 6 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Tribecca, Inc. (ghap) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C Statement of Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge) (ghap) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Andres Gomez. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Andres Gomez, (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Andres Gomez. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-27442541 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Andres Gomez. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Andres Gomez(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.