Kenneth Ray Parson v. John Christner Trucking, LLC et al
| Kenneth Ray Parson |
| Richard Lee Dilling, Does 1 to 100, inclusive and John Christner Trucking, LLC |
| 2:2020cv06917 |
| July 31, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Eastern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge Jesus G. Bernal for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Sheri Pym. New Case Number 5:20-cv-01541 JGB (SPx). (esa) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF FILING ANSWER IN STATE COURT filed by Defendants Richard Lee Dilling, John Christner Trucking, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Smith, Austin) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Richard Lee Dilling, John Christner Trucking, LLC, identifying Kenneth Ray Parson, Richard Lee Dilling, John Christner Trucking, LLC, John Christner, Darryl Christner, Danny Christner. (Smith, Austin) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendants Richard Lee Dilling, John Christner Trucking, LLC. Related Case(s): None (Smith, Austin) |
| Filing 4 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Defendants Richard Lee Dilling, John Christner Trucking, LLC.. (Smith, Austin) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants Richard Lee Dilling, John Christner Trucking, LLC. (Smith, Austin) |
| Filing 2 DECLARATION of Austin Smith re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendants Richard Lee Dilling, John Christner Trucking, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F)(Smith, Austin) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Bernardino Superior Court, case number CIVDS1920339 Receipt No: ACACDC-27446610 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendants Richard Lee Dilling, John Christner Trucking, LLC. (Attorney Austin F Smith added to party Richard Lee Dilling(pty:dft), Attorney Austin F Smith added to party John Christner Trucking, LLC(pty:dft))(Smith, Austin) |
| COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint, Jury Demand, filed by defendants Richard Lee Dilling, John Christner Trucking, LLC. (non-conformed, submitted as document 2, attachment 4)(esa) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Richard Lee Dilling, Does, John Christner Trucking, LLC, filed by plaintiff Kenneth Ray Parson. (filed in state court 7/17/19, submitted as document 2, attachment 1) (esa) |
| COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE sent by Plaintiff Kenneth Ray Parson, upon Defendant Richard Lee Dilling by mail on 6/25/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were sent to Richard Lee Drilling, defendant, in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure. Original Summons NOT returned. (non-conformed, submitted as document 2, attachment 2) (esa) |
| COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE executed by Plaintiff Kenneth Ray Parson, upon Defendant John Christner Trucking, LLC served on 6/25/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Gary Silan, Person in charge, and by mail on 6/26/20 in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity. Original Summons NOT returned. (non-conformed, submitted as document 2, attachment 3) (esa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
