Alexander Carrillo v. Sodexo Inc. et al
| Alexander Carrillo |
| Sodexo, Inc. and Does 1 through 50, inclusive |
| 2:2020cv07107 |
| August 7, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Maria A Audero |
| Dale S Fischer |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge Dale S. Fischer. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 6/21/2021. (vv)
|
|
Filing 12
Order re Jury Trial by Judge Dale S. Fischer. These dates and requirements are firm. See Trial Order for specifics. Final Pretrial Conference set for 8/16/2021 at 3:00 PM. Jury Trial set for 9/14/2021 at 8:30 AM. (vv)
|
| Filing 11 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: (IN CHAMBERS) SCHEDULING ORDER. The Court takes the Scheduling Conference off calendar and establishes the case management dates as proposed by parties in the Joint Rule 26(f) Report as further described in the Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates except as noted in the Order re Trial. (See Order re Trial for specific dates and times.) These dates and requirements are firm. The Court is very unlikely to grant continuances unless the parties establish good cause through a concrete showing. Failure to complete discovery in a timely manner does not constitute good cause,B49 nor does the fact that a settlement conference is pending. Each side is limited to five motions in limine unless the Court orders otherwise. All fictitiously named defendants are dismissed. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (vv) |
| Filing 10 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 10 days, filed by Plaintiff Alexander Carrillo.. (Stubbe, Ryan) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The Joint Report must include the completed Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates. Lead trial counsel are ordered to appear in person unless counsel have been excused by the Court. Scheduling Conference set for 9/21/2020 at 11:00 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (rfi)
|
|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant Sodexo Inc. (Moon, Alis) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Sodexo Inc (Moon, Alis) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Sodexo Inc, (Moon, Alis) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Sodexo Inc. (Moon, Alis) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 20TRCV00457 Receipt No: ACACDC-27538470 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Sodexo Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Removal - Plaintiff's Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit B to Ntc of Removal - State Documents Served, #3 Exhibit C to Ntc of Removal - Defendant's Answer to Complaint, #4 Declaration of Alis Moon, #5 Declaration of Kimberly Shackleford) (Attorney Alis Marie Moon added to party Sodexo Inc(pty:dft))(Moon, Alis) |
| CONFORMED E-FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Sodexo, Inc., Does 1 through 50, inclusive. Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Alexander Carrillo. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 6/26/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 . (et) |
| NON-CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF ALEXANDER CARRILLO'S COMPLAINT filed by Defendant Sodexo, Inc.[SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT C TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ].(et) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
