Mark Semos et al v. 3M Company, et al
| Mark Semos and Joseph Chase Rivera |
| 3M Company and Does One Through Ten, inclusive |
| 2:2020cv07125 |
| August 7, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alka Sagar |
| John F Walter |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 TEXT-ONLY ENTRY - RECEIVED Notice of Receipt of Electronic Case Transfer from Northern District of Florida, 3:20-cv-05769 filed 8/26/2020. (iv) |
| Filing 17 Conditional Transfer Order - 72 from the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, MDL 2885, transferring case to USDC, Northern District of Florida and assigned to Honorable M. Casey Rodgers. Case transferred electronically. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (iv) |
Filing 16
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) COURT ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. Counsel are hereby notified that a Scheduling Conference has been set for September 28, 2020 at 1:15 p.m. before Judge John F. Walter in Courtroom 7A, 350 W. 1st St, Los Angeles, CA 90012. Lead Trial Counsel shall attend all proceedings before this Court, including the Scheduling Conference. Counsel are directed to comply with Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 26-1 in a timely fashion and to file a Joint Report, on or before September 14, 2020. (iv)
|
|
Filing 15
STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge John F. Walter. (iv)
|
| Filing 14 TEXT ONLY ENTRY ORDER DISMISSING DOES: Pursuant to Local Rule 19-1, no complaint or petition shall be filed that includes more than ten Doe or fictitiously named parties. Accordingly, the Court hereby dismisses the action as to Doe Defendants 11 through 50, inclusive.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
|
Filing 13
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 19-03-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:19-cv-00327 JFW(ASx). Case transferred from Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg to Judge John F. Walter and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:20-cv-07125 JFW(ASx). Signed by Judge John F. Walter (rn)
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Joint NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Stay Case pending Rulings by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation #11 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed Document was not submitted as separate attachment. Other error(s) with document(s): A proposed order shall be submitted as a separate attachment to the Motion or to a Notice of Lodging. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (mrgo) |
| Filing 11 Joint NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Stay Case pending Rulings by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation filed by Defendant 3M Company. Motion set for hearing on 9/14/2020 at 01:30 PM before Judge Percy Anderson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Elizabeth, Sierra) |
|
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (See document for details) (mrgo)
|
|
Filing 9
SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [FRCP 16, 26(f)] ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. (Scheduling Conference set for 9/28/2020 at 10:30 AM before Judge Percy Anderson.) (mrgo)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (car) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants 3M Company, Does One Through Fifty, inclusive. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiffs Joseph Chase Rivera, Mark Semos. Filed in State Court on 4/30/2020 Submitted with Attachment 1 Exhibit A to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
| Filing 6 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant 3M Company, re Notice of Appearance #5 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice (Other) #3 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #4 served on 8/7/2020. (Elizabeth, Sierra) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Sierra Elizabeth on behalf of Defendant 3M Company (Elizabeth, Sierra) |
| Filing 4 Defendant's Notice of Interested Parties Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1-1 and Corporate Disclosure Statement Pursuant to FRCP 7.1 - NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant 3M Company, identifying None. (Elizabeth, Sierra) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE by Defendant's of Pendency of Other Actions or Proceedings Pursuant to L.R. 83-1.4 filed by Defendant 3M Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Elizabeth, Sierra) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant 3M Company. (Elizabeth, Sierra) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of Los Angeles, State of California, case number 20STCV16555 Receipt No: ACACDC-27543256 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant 3M Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Attorney Sierra Elizabeth added to party 3M Company(pty:dft))(Elizabeth, Sierra) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
