Benjamin L. Pavone v. State Bar of California, Office of Chief Trial Counsel Enforcement
Benjamin L Pavone and Benjamin L. Pavone |
State Bar of California, Office of Chief Trial Counsel Enforcement |
2:2020cv07193 |
August 11, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Patricia Donahue |
Fernando M Olguin |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Points and Authorities #10 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Civil Events - Other Filings - Miscellaneous Filings - Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (iv) |
Filing 10 [PLAINTIFF'S POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN REPLY ON APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION Filed as] EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to State Bar Proceeding Reply Brief filed by Plaintiff Benjamin L. Pavone. Ex Parte Application set for hearing on 9/24/2020 at 10:00 AM before Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration) (Pavone, Benjamin) Modified on 9/23/2020 (iv). |
Filing 9 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Plaintiff's Application for Temporary Restraining Order #7 is denied. (vdr) |
Filing 8 Opposition State Bar Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application for Temporary Restraining Order re: EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to Enjoin State Litigation (State Bar Case) #7 filed by Defendant State Bar of California, Office of Chief Trial Counsel Enforcement. (Attorney Marc Aaron Shapp added to party State Bar of California, Office of Chief Trial Counsel Enforcement(pty:dft))(Shapp, Marc) |
Filing 7 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to Enjoin State Litigation (State Bar Case) filed by Plaintiff Benjamin L. Pavone. Ex Parte Application set for hearing on 9/24/2020 at 10:00 AM before Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum P&A, #2 Declaration Dec. plus Exhibits, #3 Declaration M&C Compliance, #4 Proposed Order TRO, #5 Proposed Order OSC, #6 Affidavit (Proof of Service)) (Pavone, Benjamin) |
Filing 6 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Chambers of Judge Fernando M. Olguin. This matter has been assigned to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Court refers counsel to the Court's Initial Standing Order found on the Court's Website under Judge Olguin's Procedures and Schedules. Please read this Order carefully. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (vdr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (ghap) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Benjamin L Pavone, (Pavone, Benjamin) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Benjamin L Pavone. (Pavone, Benjamin) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-27572130 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Benjamin L Pavone. (Attorney Benjamin Pavone added to party Benjamin L Pavone(pty:pla))(Pavone, Benjamin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.