Chrome Hearts LLC v. Sears Holdings Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Chrome Hearts LLC
Defendant: Sears Roebuck and Co., DOES 1-10, inclusive., Sears Holdings Corporation, My Daily Styles and Does 1-10, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2020cv07227
Filed: August 11, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Dolly M Gee
Referring Judge: Steve Kim
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 2, 2020 Filing 26 REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (Attachments: #1 Order Re Permanent Injunction and Voluntary Dismissal) (gk)
December 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER RE PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT MY DAILY STYLES WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Upon Stipulation #24 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant My Daily Styles and his agents, servants, employees and all entities and/or persons in active concert and participation with him are hereby permanently restrained and enjoined from infringing upon the Chrome Hearts Marks, etc. Each Party shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs associated with the present action with neither one to be deemed as the prevailing Party. Except as provided for herein, Defendant and the action are hereby dismissed with prejudice. The Order to Show Cause dated 11/17/2020 #23 is DISCHARGED. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) (gk)
November 24, 2020 Filing 24 STIPULATION for Permanent Injunction, STIPULATION to Dismiss Defendant My Daily Styles filed by Plaintiff Chrome Hearts LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Meagle, Colby)
November 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 23 MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Dolly M. Gee: The Court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before 11/24/2020 why this action should not be dismissed as to defendant My Daily Styles for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will consider the filing of one of the following, as an appropriate response to this Order To Show Cause, on or before the above date, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligently: An answer by the following defendant(s): My Daily Styles; or, Plaintiff's application for entry of default pursuant to Rule 55a of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. This action will be dismissed as to defendant My Daily Styles if the above-mentioned document(s) are not filed by the date indicated above. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)
October 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 22 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Having received Plaintiff's notice of dismissal as to Defendants Sears Holdings Corporation and Sears Roebuck and Co. #21 , the Court hereby discharges the Order to Show Cause dated October 9, 2020 #18 . IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kti) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
October 16, 2020 Filing 21 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL filed by Plaintiff Chrome Hearts LLC pursuant to FRCP 41a(1) without prejudice as to Sears Holdings Corporation, Sears Roebuck and Co.. (Meagle, Colby)
October 16, 2020 Filing 20 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Chrome Hearts LLC, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Allan K, aka "doe", Office Manager in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Blakely, Brent)
October 9, 2020 Filing 19 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY Re: Request for Entry of Default Against Defendant My Daily Styles #17 . The Clerk cannot enter the requested relief as: There is no proof of subsequent mail service. Requesting party shall file a new Request/Application with noted deficiencies corrected in order to have default reconsidered. (gk)
October 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 18 MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Dolly M. Gee: The Court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before 10/16/2020 why this action should not be dismissed as to defendants Sears Holdings Corporation and Sears Roebuck and Co. for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will consider the filing of one of the following, as an appropriate response to this Order To Show Cause, on or before the above date, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligently: An answer by defendants Sears Holdings Corporation and Sears Roebuck and Co.; or, Plaintiff's application for entry of default pursuant to Rule 55a of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. This action will be dismissed as to defendants Sears Holdings Corporation and Sears Roebuck and Co. if the above-mentioned document(s) are not filed by the date indicated above. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)
October 7, 2020 Filing 17 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant My Daily Styles filed by Plaintiff Chrome Hearts LLC. (Meagle, Colby)
October 2, 2020 Filing 16 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY Re: Request for Entry of Default Against Defendant My Daily Styles #14 . The Clerk cannot enter the requested relief as: The name of the person served does not exactly match the person named in complaint. The Complaint names Defendant My Daily Styles. The Affidavit of Service of Summons and Complaint was filed as to My Daily Style. The return of service does not indicate the statute under which service was made. There is no proof of subsequent mail service after the substituted service. Requesting party shall file a new Request/Application with noted deficiencies corrected in order to have default reconsidered. (gk)
October 1, 2020 Filing 15 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Teresa C Chow counsel for Defendants Sears Holdings Corporation, Sears Roebuck and Co.. C. Dennis Loomis is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendants Sears Holdings Corporation and Sears Roebuck and Co.. (Chow, Teresa)
October 1, 2020 Filing 14 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant My Daily Styles filed by Plaintiff Chrome Hearts LLC. (Meagle, Colby)
August 31, 2020 Filing 13 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Sears Roebuck and Co. answer now due 10/2/2020; Sears Holdings Corporation answer now due 10/2/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendants' Sears Roebuck and Co.; Sears Holdings Corporation.(Attorney Teresa C Chow added to party Sears Holdings Corporation(pty:dft), Attorney Teresa C Chow added to party Sears Roebuck and Co.(pty:dft))(Chow, Teresa)
August 27, 2020 Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Chrome Hearts LLC, upon Defendant My Daily Styles served on 8/19/2020, answer due 9/9/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Allan K., Office Manager in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Meagle, Colby)
August 17, 2020 Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Chrome Hearts LLC, upon Defendant Sears Roebuck and Co. served on 8/13/2020, answer due 9/3/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Daisy Montenegro, CT Corporation, Agent for Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Blakely, Brent)
August 17, 2020 Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Chrome Hearts LLC, upon Defendant Sears Holdings Corporation served on 8/13/2020, answer due 9/3/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Daisy Montenegro, CT Corporation, Agent for Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Blakely, Brent)
August 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti)
August 12, 2020 Filing 8 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendants My Daily Styles, Sears Holdings Corporation, Sears Roebuck and Co. (esa)
August 12, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa)
August 12, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (esa)
August 11, 2020 Filing 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Chrome Hearts LLC. (Meagle, Colby)
August 11, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Chrome Hearts LLC, identifying None. (Meagle, Colby)
August 11, 2020 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Chrome Hearts LLC. (Meagle, Colby)
August 11, 2020 Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Chrome Hearts LLC. (Meagle, Colby)
August 11, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-27585992 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Chrome Hearts LLC. (Attorney Colby Ann Meagle added to party Chrome Hearts LLC(pty:pla))(Meagle, Colby)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chrome Hearts LLC v. Sears Holdings Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chrome Hearts LLC
Represented By: Colby Ann Meagle
Represented By: Mark S Zhai
Represented By: Brent H Blakely
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sears Roebuck and Co.
Represented By: C Dennis Loomis
Represented By: Teresa C Chow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1-10, inclusive.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sears Holdings Corporation
Represented By: C Dennis Loomis
Represented By: Teresa C Chow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: My Daily Styles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?