Luis Villegas v. Wong-One, LLC et al
| Luis Villegas |
| DOES 1-10, Dzubak Investments, LLC and Wong-One, LLC |
| 2:2020cv07291 |
| August 13, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Ronald SW Lew |
| Alka Sagar |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a) as to Dzubak Investments, LLC. (shb) |
| Filing 16 DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a) as to Wong-One, LLC (shb) |
| Filing 15 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant Dzubak Investments, LLC filed by Plaintiff Luis Villegas. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Amanda Seabock, #2 Proof of Service) (Seabock, Amanda) |
| Filing 14 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant Wong-One, LLC filed by Plaintiff Luis Villegas. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Amanda Seabock, #2 Proof of Service) (Seabock, Amanda) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Luis Villegas, upon Defendant Wong-One, LLC served on 8/20/2020, answer due 9/10/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Agent for Service Process: George Wong in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Constitutional Question filed by Plaintiff Luis Villegas. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Luis Villegasto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, Order to Show Cause, #9 (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Proof of Service)(Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Luis Villegas, upon Defendant Dzubak Investments, LLC acknowledgment sent by Plaintiff on 8/20/2020, answer due 9/10/2020. Acknowledgment of Service signed by Joyce Yi, Manager- LegalZoom.com, Inc.. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 8 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation (early mediation and stay program). (jre) |
Filing 9
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE EXERCISE OF SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION RE STATE LAW CLAIMS by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. The Court ORDERS Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE in writing why the Court should exercise supplementaljurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim and all other state law claims asserted in the Complaint. Plaintiff shall file a Response to this Order to Show Cause by no later than August 24, 2020. See order for further details. (shb)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Dzubak Investments, LLC, Wong-One, LLC. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Ronald S. W. Lew and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Luis Villegas. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Luis Villegas, (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Luis Villegas. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-27615018 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Luis Villegas. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Luis Villegas(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
