Double Coin Tyre Group Ltd et al v. Regal Nova Int, LLC
| Double Coin Tyre Group Ltd and China Manufacturers Alliance LLC |
| Regal Nova Int, LLC and DOES 1 through 10 |
| 2:2020cv07361 |
| August 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Charles F Eick |
| Mark C Scarsi |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Regal Nova Int, LLC answer now due 10/19/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiffs Double Coin Tyre Group Ltd; China Manufacturers Alliance LLC.(Bergman, Steven) |
Filing 11
ORDER OF THE CHIEF JUDGE (#20-136) approved by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Pursuant to the recommended procedure adopted by the Court for the CREATION OF CALENDAR of Judge Mark C. Scarsi, this case is transferred from Judge John A. Kronstadt to the calendar of Judge Mark C. Scarsi for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:20-cv-07361 MCS(Ex). (rn)
|
| Filing 10 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff Double Coin Tyre Group Ltd identifying Shanghai Huayi Group Corp Ltd as Corporate Parent. (Bergman, Steven) |
| Filing 9 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff China Manufacturers Alliance LLC identifying China Manufacturers Alliance LLC as Corporate Parent. (Bergman, Steven) |
| Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Double Coin Tyre Group Ltd, China Manufacturers Alliance LLC, upon Defendant Regal Nova Int, LLC served on 8/28/2020, answer due 9/18/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Lynn Barrick, Registered Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Bergman, Steven) |
|
Filing 7
STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT upon filing of the complaint by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court's Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (droj)
|
| Filing 6 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Regal Nova Int, LLC. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (jtil) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiffs China Manufacturers Alliance LLC, Double Coin Tyre Group Ltd. (Bergman, Steven) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs China Manufacturers Alliance LLC, Double Coin Tyre Group Ltd. (Bergman, Steven) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-27640670 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Double Coin Tyre Group Ltd. (Attorney Steven H Bergman added to party Double Coin Tyre Group Ltd(pty:pla))(Bergman, Steven) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
