Automobilia II, LLC v. Buzzfeed, Inc. et al
Automobilia II, LLC |
Does 1 through 10 and Buzzfeed, Inc. |
2:2020cv07368 |
August 14, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Patrick J Walsh |
Otis D Wright |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Buzzfeed, Inc., identifying NBCUniversal Media, LLC; Comcast Corp.. (Williams, Jeffrey) |
Filing 13 ORDER that the Scheduling Conference is set for December 21, 2020 1:30 PM ; compliance with FRCP 16, and 26(f) and filing of joint report; Counsel for plaintiff shall immediately serve this Order on all parties, including any new parties to the action by Judge Otis D Wright, II (lc) |
Filing 12 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #11 by Buzzfeed, Inc. The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) |
Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Buzzfeed, Inc..(Attorney Jeffrey N Williams added to party Buzzfeed, Inc.(pty:dft))(Williams, Jeffrey) |
Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Automobilia II, LLC, upon Defendant Buzzfeed, Inc. served on 8/21/2020, answer due 9/11/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Corporation Service Company c/o Koy Saechoe - Registered Agent for Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Burroughs, Scott) |
Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. Counsel are STRONGLY encouraged to review the Central Districts website for additional information.. The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. Please refer to the Judges procedures and schedules for detailed instructions for submission of sealed documents. (lc) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Buzzfeed, Inc. (esa) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh. (esa) |
Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Automobilia II, LLC. (Burroughs, Scott) |
Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Automobilia II, LLC. (Burroughs, Scott) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Automobilia II, LLC. (Burroughs, Scott) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Automobilia II, LLC, (Burroughs, Scott) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-27639683 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Automobilia II, LLC. (Attorney Scott A Burroughs added to party Automobilia II, LLC(pty:pla))(Burroughs, Scott) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.