Armando Prado v. Hammond Power Solutions, Inc. et al
Armando Prado |
Does 1 through 20, inclusive, Larry Lichty and Hammond Power Solutions, Inc. |
2:2020cv07401 |
August 17, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John W Holcomb |
Alka Sagar |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Los Angeles Superior Court, County of Los Angeles. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Los Angeles Superior Court, County of Los Angeles. (yl) |
Filing 15 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error, the incorrect document was attached to document entry #14 and will be re-filed. (yl) |
Filing 14 **REFER TO NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR** TRANSMITTAL of documents to Los Angeles Superior Court, County of Los Angeles. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Los Angeles Superior Court, County of Los Angeles. (yl) Modified on 10/1/2020 (yl). |
![]() |
Filing 12 Joint STIPULATION to Remand Case to State Court filed by Defendants Hammond Power Solutions, Inc., Larry Lichty. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order re Joint Stipulation to Remand Case to State Court)(Wu, James) |
![]() |
Filing 10 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge Stephen V. Wilson The initial status conference previously scheduled for 11/02/2020 at 3:00 p.m. has been rescheduled to 10/19/2020 at 1:30 PM. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (pc) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court filed by plaintiff Armando Prado. Motion set for hearing on 10/19/2020 at 01:30 PM before Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Daniel J. Friedman, #2 Evidentiary Objections, #3 Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Elihu, Kaveh) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (jtil) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Armando Prado in Los Angeles County Superior Court on 7/16/2020, attached as Exhibit A. (jtil) |
CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by Defendants Hammond Power Solutions, Inc., Larry Lichty in Los Angeles Superior Court on 8/14/2020, attached as Exhibit C. (jtil) |
Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants Hammond Power Solutions, Inc., Larry Lichty. (Wu, James) |
Filing 3 DECLARATION of Catherine McKeown for Hammond Power Solutions, Inc. and Larry Lichty filed by Defendants Hammond Power Solutions, Inc., Larry Lichty. (Wu, James) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Hammond Power Solutions, Inc., Larry Lichty, identifying Hammond Power Solutions, Inc.. (Wu, James) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court - Central District, case number 20STCV26805 Receipt No: ACACDC-27657909 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendants Does, Larry Lichty, Hammond Power Solutions, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exh A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit Exh B - Summons, et al, #3 Exhibit Exh C - Answer, #4 Exhibit Exh D - Notice to State Court) (Attorney James Y Wu added to party Does(pty:dft), Attorney James Y Wu added to party Hammond Power Solutions, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney James Y Wu added to party Larry Lichty(pty:dft))(Wu, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.