Orlando Garcia v. Joseph Conzonire et al
| Orlando Garcia |
| DOES 1-10, Joseph Conzonire, Ronald H. Conzonire, Marilyn L. Conzonire, Janice Conzonire and C & J Food Company |
| 2:2020cv07452 |
| August 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John A Kronstadt |
| Gail J Standish |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants C & J Food Company, Janice Conzonire, Joseph Conzonire, Marilyn L. Conzonire, Ronald H. Conzonire, identifying No other interested parties. (Abraham, Stephen) |
| Filing 16 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendants C & J Food Company, Janice Conzonire, Joseph Conzonire, Marilyn L. Conzonire, Ronald H. Conzonire.(Abraham, Stephen) |
| Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Orlando Garcia, upon Defendant Janice Conzonire served on 10/1/2020, answer due 10/22/2020. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 14 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to C & J Food Company answer now due 10/12/2020; Ronald H. Conzonire answer now due 10/12/2020; Janice Conzonire answer now due 10/12/2020; Joseph Conzonire answer now due 10/12/2020; Marilyn L. Conzonire answer now due 10/12/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendants C & J Food Company; Ronald H. Conzonire; Janice Conzonire; Joseph Conzonire; Marilyn L. Conzonire.(Abraham, Stephen) |
| Filing 13 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to C & J Food Company answer now due 9/28/2020; Ronald H. Conzonire answer now due 9/28/2020; Janice Conzonire answer now due 9/28/2020; Joseph Conzonire answer now due 9/28/2020; Marilyn L. Conzonire answer now due 9/28/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendants C & J Food Company; Ronald H. Conzonire; Janice Conzonire; Joseph Conzonire; Marilyn L. Conzonire.(Attorney Stephen E Abraham added to party C & J Food Company(pty:dft), Attorney Stephen E Abraham added to party Janice Conzonire(pty:dft), Attorney Stephen E Abraham added to party Joseph Conzonire(pty:dft), Attorney Stephen E Abraham added to party Marilyn L. Conzonire(pty:dft), Attorney Stephen E Abraham added to party Ronald H. Conzonire(pty:dft))(Abraham, Stephen) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Orlando Garcia, upon Defendant C & J Food Company served on 9/3/2020, answer due 9/24/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Joseph Conzonire- Corporate secretary and Director in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Orlando Garcia, upon Defendant Ronald H. Conzonire served on 8/24/2020, answer due 9/14/2020. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Orlando Garcia, upon Defendant Marilyn L. Conzonire served on 8/24/2020, answer due 9/14/2020. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Orlando Garcia, upon Defendant Joseph Conzonire served on 8/22/2020, answer due 9/14/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Joseph Conzonire, in individual and representative capacity as Trustee of The Joseph and Janice Conzonire Trust established March 31, 2009 in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 8
STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT upon filing of the complaint by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court's Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (vv)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants C & J Food Company, Janice Conzonire, Joseph Conzonire, Marilyn L. Conzonire and Ronald H. Conzonire. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Orlando Garcia. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Orlando Garcia, (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Orlando Garcia. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-27677703 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Orlando Garcia. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Orlando Garcia(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
