Marisa Graef v. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc. et al
| Marisa Graef |
| DOES 1 to 100, Inclusive, Fedex Ground Package System, Inc,, FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. and Does 1 to 10, Inclusive |
| 2:2020cv07456 |
| August 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Steve Kim |
| John F Walter |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 23
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COURT ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. As a result of the parties' violation of the Court's Order, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Pretrial Conference scheduled for November 19, 2021, the Trial scheduled for December 14, 2021, and any other dates calendared in this matter are hereby VACATED. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (iv)
|
| Filing 22 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Omar Mohammed Aniff counsel for Defendant FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.. Adding Omar M. Aniff as counsel of record for FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC.. (Attorney Omar Mohammed Aniff added to party FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.(pty:dft))(Aniff, Omar) |
|
Filing 21
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim re Stipulation for Protective Order #20 . (see document for details) (hr)
|
| Filing 20 STIPULATION for Protective Order filed by Defendant FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Atalay, Melis) |
|
Filing 19
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS CLASS ACTION ALLEGATIONS [filed 4/14/2021; Docket No. #17 ] by Judge John F. Walter. For the reasons stated in Plaintiff's moving papers and in light of Defendant's Non-Opposition, Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Class Action Allegations is GRANTED. The class action allegations are DISMISSED without prejudice. (iv)
|
| Filing 18 NOTICE OF NON-OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Class Action Allegations #17 filed by Defendant FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Melis Atalay, #2 Exhibit A-C)(Atalay, Melis) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Class Action Allegations filed by Plaintiff Marisa Graef. Motion set for hearing on 5/17/2021 at 01:30 PM before Judge John F. Walter. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proposed Order) (Miller, Courtney) |
| Filing 16 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Courtney Marisa Miller counsel for Plaintiff Marisa Graef. Adding Courtney Marisa Miller as counsel of record for Plaintiff Marisa Graef for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Marisa Graef. (Attorney Courtney Marisa Miller added to party Marisa Graef(pty:pla))(Miller, Courtney) |
|
Filing 15
SCHEDULING AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. The purpose of this Order is to notify the parties and their counsel of the deadlines and the schedule that will govern this action. Pretrial Conference set for 11/9/2021 at 8:00 AM. Hearing on Motions in Limine; Disputed Jury Instructions set for 12/3/2021 at 8:00 AM. Jury Trial set for 12/14/2021 at 8:30 AM. (iv)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER VACATING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE, REFERRAL TO PRIVATE MEDIATION, and DISMISSING ANY UNSERVED DOE DEFENDANTS by Judge John F. Walter. The Court has reviewed the parties' Joint Rule 26(f) Report and finds that a Scheduling Conference is not necessary. The hearing on September 28, 2020 is vacated and taken off calendar. A Scheduling and Case Management Order will issue. Any unserved DOE defendants are dismissed at this time. The Court, having considered the parties' Request: ADR Procedure Selection, the Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program, or the report submitted by the parties pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) and Civil L.R. 26-1, hereby: ORDERS this case referred to: ADR PROCEDURE NO. 3: (Private mediation). The ADR proceeding is to be completed no later than: May 10, 2021. The Joint Report re: Results of Settlement Conference due on: May 14, 2021. (iv)
|
| Filing 13 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 15 days, filed by Plaintiff Marisa Graef.. (Granberry, Vincent) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Marisa Graef, identifying FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.. (Granberry, Vincent) |
| Filing 11 SUPPLEMENT to Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A -J to Supplement to Notice of Removal)(Atalay, Melis) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.. NOTICE OF RELATED CASE AND PENDENCY OF OTHER ACTION OR PROCEEDING PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULES 83-1.3 AND 83-1.4 (Atalay, Melis) |
| Filing 9 DECLARATION of Evan R. Moses Lead Trial Counsel filed by Defendant FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.. (Moses, Evan) |
|
Filing 8
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) COURT ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. Counsel are hereby notified that a Scheduling Conference has been set for September 28, 2020 at 1:15 p.m. before Judge John F. Walter in Courtroom 7A, 350 W. 1st St, Los Angeles, CA 90012. Lead Trial Counsel shall attend all proceedings before this Court, including the Scheduling Conference. Counsel are directed to comply with Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 26-1 in a timely fashion and to file a Joint Report, on or before September 14, 2020. (iv)
|
|
Filing 7
STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge John F. Walter. (iv)
|
| Filing 6 TEXT ONLY ENTRY ORDER DISMISSING DOES: Pursuant to Local Rule 19-1, no complaint or petition shall be filed that includes more than ten Doe or fictitiously named parties. Accordingly, the Court hereby dismisses the action as to Doe Defendants 11 through 100, inclusive.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John F. Walter and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (car) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, Fedex Ground Package System, Inc,.(Filing fee $ 400) Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Marisa Graef. Filed in State Court on 6/10/2020 Submitted with Attachment 1 Exhibit A to Notice of Removal #1 (car) Modified on 8/20/2020 (car). |
| NON-CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Fedex Ground Package System, Inc. Submitted with Attachment 3 Exhibit C to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Fedex Ground Package System, Inc,, (Atalay, Melis) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Fedex Ground Package System, Inc,. (Atalay, Melis) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 20STCV22720 Receipt No: ACACDC-27682154 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Fedex Ground Package System, Inc,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B- Other Pleadings, #3 Exhibit C- Answer to Complaint, #4 Declaration of Andrea K. Cox ISO, #5 Declaration of Alexander M. Chemers ISO) (Attorney Melis Atalay added to party Fedex Ground Package System, Inc,(pty:dft))(Atalay, Melis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
