Tisha Jamison v. Merrick Bank
| Tisha Jamison |
| Merrick Bank |
| 2:2020cv07459 |
| August 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Paul L Abrams |
| John W Holcomb |
| Consumer Credit |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 0227 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 This action has been reassigned to the Honorable John W. Holcomb, United States District Judge. Judge Holcomb is located in Courtroom 2, on the 2nd Floor of the George E. Brown, Jr. Federal Building and United States Courthouse at 3470 Twelfth Street, Riverside, California 92501. Additional information regarding Judge Holcomb's procedures and schedules is available on the court's website at www.cacd.uscourts.gov. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (iva) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 17
ORDER OF THE CHIEF JUDGE (#20-148) approved by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Pursuant to the recommended procedure adopted by the Court for the CREATION OF CALENDAR of Judge John W. Holcomb, this case is transferred from Judge Andre Birotte Jr to the calendar of Judge John W. Holcomb for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:20-cv-07459 JWH(PLAx). (rn)
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Scheduling Conference set for 1/22/2021 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
|
| Filing 15 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 and Affirmative Defenses to the Complaint filed by Defendant Merrick Bank.(Mayer, Danielle) |
| Filing 14 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Merrick Bank answer now due 9/24/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Merrick Bank.(Mayer, Danielle) |
| Filing 13 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Merrick Bank (Mayer, Danielle) |
| Filing 12 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Merrick Bank, (Mayer, Danielle) |
| Filing 11 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Danielle Michelle Mayer counsel for Defendant Merrick Bank. Adding Danielle M. Mayer as counsel of record for Merrick Bank for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Merrick Bank. (Attorney Danielle Michelle Mayer added to party Merrick Bank(pty:dft))(Mayer, Danielle) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Tisha Jamison, upon Defendant Merrick Bank served on 8/20/2020, answer due 9/10/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Socorro Smith, who is designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of Merrick Bank in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Hammoud, Youssef) |
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Merrick Bank. (lom) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Tisha Jamison, (Hammoud, Youssef) |
| Filing 6 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Tisha Jamison. (Hammoud, Youssef) |
| Filing 5 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Tisha Jamison. (Hammoud, Youssef) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: The Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71)is missing or incomplete. All civil actions presented for filing must be accompanied by a completed Civil Cover Sheet. See Local Rule 3-1. Counsel must file a completed Civil Cover Sheet immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (lh) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. (lh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-27679933 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Tisha Jamison. (Attorney Youssef Hussein Hammoud added to party Tisha Jamison(pty:pla))(Hammoud, Youssef) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Tisha Jamison v. Merrick Bank | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tisha Jamison | |
| Represented By: | Youssef Hussein Hammoud |
| Represented By: | Lauren Tegan Rodkey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Merrick Bank | |
| Represented By: | Danielle Michelle Mayer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
