Luis Marquez v. Ahmed Radwan et al
| Luis Marquez |
| Does 1-10, Lucky Oil Company, Inc., Nanees Ahmed Salama and Ahmed Radwan |
| 2:2020cv07546 |
| August 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Stanley Blumenfeld |
| Pedro V Castillo |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Settlement and request to vacate all currently set dates filed by Plaintiff Luis Marquez. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Seabock, Amanda) |
| Filing 14 DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a) as to Lucky Oil Company, Inc., a California Corporation. (gk) |
| Filing 13 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant Lucky Oil Company, Inc. filed by Plaintiff Luis Marquez. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proof of Service) (Seabock, Amanda) |
Filing 12
ORDER OF THE CHIEF JUDGE (#20-110) approved by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Pursuant to the recommended procedure adopted by the Court for the CREATION OF CALENDAR of Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr., this case is transferred from Judge Stephen V. Wilson to the calendar of Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:20-cv-07546-SB-PVCx. (mrgo)
|
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Luis Marquez, upon Defendant Nanees Ahmed Salama served on 9/12/2020, answer due 10/5/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jane doe co Occupant in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Luis Marquez, upon Defendant Ahmed Radwan served on 9/12/2020, answer due 10/5/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jane doe co occupant in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Luis Marquez, upon Defendant Lucky Oil Company, Inc. served on 9/10/2020, answer due 10/1/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Albabul Hnq- Manager in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
|
Filing 8
NEW CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Lucky Oil Company, Inc., Ahmed Radwan, Nanees Ahmed Salama. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (et) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Luis Marquez. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Luis Marquez, (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Luis Marquez. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-27711442 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Luis Marquez. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Luis Marquez(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
