Ramon Estrada Pastrano v. Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc.
| Ramon Pastrano and Ramon Estrada Pastrano |
| Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc., Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Roadrunner Freight, Roadrunner Transportation Services, Inc. a corporation doing business as Roadrunner Freight, Darril Hough and Does 1 through 20, inclusive |
| 2:2020cv07587 |
| August 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andre Birotte |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Scheduling Conference set for 12/11/2020 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
|
| Filing 10 ANSWER to Amended Complaint, filed by Defendant Roadrunner Transportation Services, Inc., Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc..(Juvinall, Kate) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Stipulation for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply, #8 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed order not submitted pursuant to Local Rule 52-4.1. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (gk) |
| Filing 8 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Response as to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendants Roadrunner Freight, Roadrunner Transportation Services, Inc., Roadrunner Transportation Systems.(Attorney Kate Elsa Juvinall added to party Roadrunner Freight(pty:dft), Attorney Kate Elsa Juvinall added to party Roadrunner Transportation Systems(pty:dft))(Juvinall, Kate) |
|
Filing 7
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (esa) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE executed by Plaintiff Ramon Estrada Pastrano, upon Defendant Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc. served on 7/21/2020. Service of the Summons and First Amended Complaint were executed upon Anthony Welsh, Manager, in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity. Original Summons NOT returned. (filed in state court 7/27/20, submitted as document 2, attachment 1, p. 54 (esa) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE executed by Plaintiff Ramon Estrada Pastrano, upon Defendant Roadrunner Freight served on 7/21/2020. Service of the Summons and First Amended Complaint were executed upon Anthony Welsh, Manager, in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity. Original Summons NOT returned. (filed in state court 7/27/20, submitted as document 2, attachment 1, p. 52) (esa) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendants Does, Roadrunner Transportation Services, Inc., Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc., Roadrunner Freight, Darril Hough; Party Roadrunner Transportation Systems (an entity of unknown form) terminated, filed by plaintiff Ramon Estrada Pastrano. (filed in state court 6/10/20, submitted as document 2, attachment 1, p. 33)(esa) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Does, Roadrunner Transportation Services, Inc., Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc., Jury Demanded, filed by plaintiff Ramon Estrada Pastrano. (filed in state court 5/29/20, submitted as document 2, attachment 1, p. 9) (esa) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE executed by Plaintiff Ramon Estrada Pastrano, upon Defendant Roadrunner Transportation Services, Inc. served on 7/20/2020. Service of the Summons and First Amended Complaint were executed upon CT Corporation, Agent for Service of Process, in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity. Original Summons NOT returned. (filed in state court 7/27/20, submitted as document 2, attachment 1, p. 50) (esa) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc.. (Juvinall, Kate) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc., identifying Roadrunner Transportation Services, Inc.. (Juvinall, Kate) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from The Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles, case number 20STCV20505 with filing fee previously paid receipt number 27723185), filed by Defendant Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court File, #2 Exhibit B - Mikulecky Declaration, #3 Exhibit C - Juvinall Declaration)(Juvinall, Kate) |
| Filing 1 * CIVIL COVER SHEET * filed as APPLICATION Civil Cover Sheet with filing fee previously paid receipt number 27723185), filed by Defendant Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc.. (Attorney Kate Elsa Juvinall added to party Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc.(pty:dft))(Juvinall, Kate) Modified on 8/21/2020 (esa). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
