Jonathan Heller v. Nordstrom Card Services, Inc., et al
| Jonathan Heller |
| Nordstrom Card Services, Inc. and Does 1-10, inclusive |
| 2:2020cv07623 |
| August 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael R Wilner |
| Otis D Wright |
| Consumer Credit |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice (Other) #16 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Notice :Settlement. Other error(s) with document(s): Note: To assist in a search for correct events, please use the "SEARCH" option for a "key word" to narrow the selection process. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE filed by plaintiff Jonathan Heller. of settlement (Bacon, Adrian) |
Filing 15
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court having considered the parties Stipulation To Extend Time To Respond To The Initial Complaint #14 , and good cause appearing therefor, it is hereby ORDERED that the time for Defendant Nordstrom Card Services, Inc. to respond to the initial complaint is extended up to and including November 20, 2020. (lc)
|
| Filing 14 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Nordstrom Card Services, Inc. answer now due 11/20/2020, re Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Nordstrom Card Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Norris, Christopher) |
|
Filing 13
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court having considered the parties' Stipulation To Extend Time To Respond To The Initial Complaint, and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, it is hereby ORDERED that thetime for Defendant Nordstrom Card Services, Inc. to respond to the initial complaint is extended up to and including October 21, 2020 #12 . (lc)
|
| Filing 12 Second STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Nordstrom Card Services, Inc. answer now due 10/21/2020, re Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Nordstrom Card Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order [Proposed] Order Extending Time to Respond to Initial Complaint)(Norris, Christopher) |
| Filing 11 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Nordstrom Card Services, Inc. answer now due 9/21/2020, filed by Defendant Nordstrom Card Services, Inc..(Norris, Christopher) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 19-03 (Related Case) filed. Transfer of case declined by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez, for the reasons set forth on this order. Related Case No. 2:20-cv-06063 PSG(RAOx) (Attachments: #1 declination letter) (rn)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error Re: Notice to Parties ADA Disability Access Litigation (ADR-20) #8 , Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive #7 : ADA documents should not have been docketed in this case. (lc) |
| Filing 8 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (lc) |
|
Filing 7
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: ORDER REGARDING PROSECUTION OF CERTAIN CASES UNDER THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT. (SEE DOCUMENT SPECIFICS). The Court finds that there is good cause to institute a limited scheduling order concerning basic case prosecution for cases under the Americans With Disabilities Act involving physical barriers in places of public accommodation. In such cases: 1. Proofs of Service: Proofs of service for all defendants must be filed within 95 days. 2.Requests for Default: For any defendant who fails to respond to the complaint within the time provided by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and for whom no extension has been granted, a request for default must be filed no later than five court days after the time the response to the complaint would have been due. 3. Motions for Default Judgment: If only defaulted defendants remain in the case i.e., no other defendants were named or the claims against all other defendants have been resolved either by dismissal, motion, or trial a motion for default judgment must be filed within 10 calendar days of the last entry of default. Note that the Court is not generally inclined to enter partial default judgments, and, therefore, a motion for default judgment should not be filed if some defendants have appeared and the case has not otherwise been completely resolved. The failure to comply with this Order in a particular case will result in a sanction of $300.00 payable to the clerk of the court within two weeks of Plaintiff being given notice of noncompliance and dismissal for lack of prosecution. The Court finds these sanctions sufficient and necessary to deter violations of the Order and to achieve timely prosecution of these cases without unnecessary intervention by the Court. (lc)
|
|
Filing 6
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. Counsel are STRONGLY encouraged to review the Central Districts website for additional information. The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. Please refer to the Judges procedures and schedules for detailed instructions for submission of sealed documents. (lc)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (esa) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Nordstrom Card Services, Inc., Does, Jury Demanded, filed by plaintiff Jonathan Heller. (filed in state court 7/8/20, submitted as document 1, attachment 2) (esa) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Nordstrom Card Services, Inc., re Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #2 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 served on August 21, 2020. (Norris, Christopher) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Nordstrom Card Services, Inc., identifying Nordstrom Card Services, Inc.. (Norris, Christopher) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Ventura, case number 56-2020-00543193-CL-NP-VTA Receipt No: ACACDC-27736842 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Nordstrom Card Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Notice of Removal of Action, #2 Exhibit B to Notice of Removal of Action, #3 Exhibit C to Notice of Removal of Action, #4 Exhibit D to Notice of Removal of Action, #5 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Christopher Todd Norris added to party Nordstrom Card Services, Inc.(pty:dft))(Norris, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
